Deep Learning-Based Causal Inference for Large-Scale Combinatorial Experiments: Theory and Empirical Evidence

Large-scale online platforms launch hundreds of randomized experiments (also known as A/B tests) every day to iterate their operations and marketing strategies. The combinations of these treatments are typically not exhaustively tested, which triggers an important question of both academic and practical interest. Without observing the outcomes of all treatment combinations, how does one estimate the causal effect of any treatment combination and identify the optimal treatment combination? We develop a novel framework combining deep learning and doubly robust estimation to estimate the causal effect of any treatment combination for each user on the platform when observing only a small subset of treatment combinations. Our proposed framework (called debiased deep learning ( DeDL )) exploits Neyman orthogonality and combines interpretable and flexible structural layers in deep learning. We show theoretically that this framework yields efficient, consistent, and asymptotically normal estimators under mild assumptions, thus allowing for identifying the best treatment combination when observing only a few combinations. To empirically validate our method, we collaborated with a large-scale video-sharing platform and implemented our framework for three experiments involving three treatments, where each combination of treatments is tested. When observing only a subset of treatment combinations, our DeDL approach significantly outperforms other benchmarks to accurately estimate and infer the average treatment effect of any treatment combination and to identify the optimal treatment combination. This paper was accepted by Vivek Farias, data science. Funding: R. Zhang is grateful for financial support from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council General Research Fund [Grants 14502722, 14503224, and 14504123]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.04625 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.04625
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning-Based Causal Inference for Large-Scale Combinatorial Experiments: Theory and Empirical Evidence

Z. Zhang, Zikun Ye, Heng Zhang, Dennis Zhang et al.
Management Science
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Deep Learning-Based Causal Inference for Large-Scale Combinatorial Experiments: Theory and Empirical Evidence

Z. Zhang, Zikun Ye, Heng Zhang, Dennis Zhang, Renyu Zhang
article en

Abstract

Large-scale online platforms launch hundreds of randomized experiments (also known as A/B tests) every day to iterate their operations and marketing strategies. The combinations of these treatments are typically not exhaustively tested, which triggers an important question of both academic and practical interest. Without observing the outcomes of all treatment combinations, how does one estimate the causal effect of any treatment combination and identify the optimal treatment combination? We develop a novel framework combining deep learning and doubly robust estimation to estimate the causal effect of any treatment combination for each user on the platform when observing only a small subset of treatment combinations. Our proposed framework (called debiased deep learning ( DeDL )) exploits Neyman orthogonality and combines interpretable and flexible structural layers in deep learning. We show theoretically that this framework yields efficient, consistent, and asymptotically normal estimators under mild assumptions, thus allowing for identifying the best treatment combination when observing only a few combinations. To empirically validate our method, we collaborated with a large-scale video-sharing platform and implemented our framework for three experiments involving three treatments, where each combination of treatments is tested. When observing only a subset of treatment combinations, our DeDL approach significantly outperforms other benchmarks to accurately estimate and infer the average treatment effect of any treatment combination and to identify the optimal treatment combination. This paper was accepted by Vivek Farias, data science. Funding: R. Zhang is grateful for financial support from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council General Research Fund [Grants 14502722, 14503224, and 14504123]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.04625 .

Management Science
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), University of Washington (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.