Augmented Reality–Guided Pedicle Screw Placement With 2D–3D Registration: Proof-Of-Concept Using 151 Cadaveric Trajectories

Study DesignProspective, single-center cadaveric study.ObjectivesTo evaluate the accuracy of augmented reality (AR) head-mounted display navigation using a 2D-3D registration method for pedicle screw placement that integrates preoperative CT scans with intraoperative X-ray images, eliminating the need for intraoperative 3D imaging.MethodsA prospective, single-center cadaveric study was conducted using six human cadaveric specimens. Five board-certified spine surgeons placed 151 pedicle screws across cervical (n = 36), thoracic (n = 54), lumbar (n = 41), and sacroiliac (n = 20) regions using an AR navigation system. The system utilized preoperative CT scans registered with intraoperative X-ray images. Accuracy was assessed stereotactically (angular and translational errors) and clinically (Gertzbein-Robbins and Heary classifications).ResultsOf 151 pedicle screws placed, 147 (97.4%) were accurately positioned in the "safe zone" (Gertzbein-Robbins grades A/B or Heary classifications I/II). The 99% upper bound limit for angular errors was <3 and translational errors was < 3 mm in both axial and sagittal planes across all vertebral levels.ConclusionsThe 2D-3D registration methodology with AR visualization demonstrates high accuracy for pedicle screw placement comparable to conventional navigation techniques. This approach effectively addresses key limitations of existing navigation paradigms while maintaining high accuracy standards without requiring intraoperative 3D imaging capabilities. AR-assisted navigation with 2D-3D registration represents a promising technological advancement that may enhance the precision and efficiency of spinal instrumentation procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Spine Journal
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251387550
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Augmented Reality–Guided Pedicle Screw Placement With 2D–3D Registration: Proof-Of-Concept Using 151 Cadaveric Trajectories

Hania Shahzad, José A. García del Castillo, Dustin H. Massel, Chad E. Cook et al.
1 citations
Global Spine Journal
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
2.01
article

Augmented Reality–Guided Pedicle Screw Placement With 2D–3D Registration: Proof-Of-Concept Using 151 Cadaveric Trajectories

Hania Shahzad, José A. García del Castillo, Dustin H. Massel, Chad E. Cook, Nicholas Shepard, Michael Le, Safdar N. Khan, Richard L. Price, Venina Kalistratova, Gabriel Urreola, Anthony M. Harris, Richard Lim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Study DesignProspective, single-center cadaveric study.ObjectivesTo evaluate the accuracy of augmented reality (AR) head-mounted display navigation using a 2D-3D registration method for pedicle screw placement that integrates preoperative CT scans with intraoperative X-ray images, eliminating the need for intraoperative 3D imaging.MethodsA prospective, single-center cadaveric study was conducted using six human cadaveric specimens. Five board-certified spine surgeons placed 151 pedicle screws across cervical (n = 36), thoracic (n = 54), lumbar (n = 41), and sacroiliac (n = 20) regions using an AR navigation system. The system utilized preoperative CT scans registered with intraoperative X-ray images. Accuracy was assessed stereotactically (angular and translational errors) and clinically (Gertzbein-Robbins and Heary classifications).ResultsOf 151 pedicle screws placed, 147 (97.4%) were accurately positioned in the "safe zone" (Gertzbein-Robbins grades A/B or Heary classifications I/II). The 99% upper bound limit for angular errors was <3 and translational errors was < 3 mm in both axial and sagittal planes across all vertebral levels.ConclusionsThe 2D-3D registration methodology with AR visualization demonstrates high accuracy for pedicle screw placement comparable to conventional navigation techniques. This approach effectively addresses key limitations of existing navigation paradigms while maintaining high accuracy standards without requiring intraoperative 3D imaging capabilities. AR-assisted navigation with 2D-3D registration represents a promising technological advancement that may enhance the precision and efficiency of spinal instrumentation procedures.

Global Spine Journal
NorthShore University HealthSystem (US), Lancaster General Hospital (US), Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance (US), Fairfield Medical Center (US), Lancaster City Council (GB), Neurological Surgery (US), Midwest Orthopaedic Research Foundation (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.