The social character of contemporary painting: Buchloh on Richter’s politics

This article considers how Benjamin Buchloh interprets the political significance of paintings by Gerhard Richter. The issue is crucial because Buchloh believes this is where their meaning and value reside. Buchloh sets Richter’s work in two historical contexts: Germany during and after the Second World War, and a history of modernist painting, a process of enlightenment criticism in which the illusions of aesthetics are corrected and new artistic freedoms achieved. A current crisis in critical thinking and practice is the result of world events but also how the very achievements of modernism eventually became problematic, aesthetically and politically. In light of Richter’s October 18, 1977 group, the Strips and Sinbad series, and his sequence ‘family portraits’ it is argued that Buchloh’s interpretation is problematic for both painting and politics. The article concludes by discussing the implications of this version of left cultural critique and the challenges of forming a positive, practical way of interacting with the history of painting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contemporary Painting
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1386/jcp_00078_1
Primary Topic
Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The social character of contemporary painting: Buchloh on Richter’s politics

Ian Heywood
Journal of Contemporary Painting
Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation
article

The social character of contemporary painting: Buchloh on Richter’s politics

Ian Heywood
article en

Abstract

This article considers how Benjamin Buchloh interprets the political significance of paintings by Gerhard Richter. The issue is crucial because Buchloh believes this is where their meaning and value reside. Buchloh sets Richter’s work in two historical contexts: Germany during and after the Second World War, and a history of modernist painting, a process of enlightenment criticism in which the illusions of aesthetics are corrected and new artistic freedoms achieved. A current crisis in critical thinking and practice is the result of world events but also how the very achievements of modernism eventually became problematic, aesthetically and politically. In light of Richter’s October 18, 1977 group, the Strips and Sinbad series, and his sequence ‘family portraits’ it is argued that Buchloh’s interpretation is problematic for both painting and politics. The article concludes by discussing the implications of this version of left cultural critique and the challenges of forming a positive, practical way of interacting with the history of painting.

Journal of Contemporary PaintingVol. 11(1)
Film Independent (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.