A prospective single-masked, non-inferiority, parallel-group randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of a ChatGPT-based AI chatbot to improve Boston bowel preparation scores for colonoscopy preparation: A trial protocol

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare through tools like large language model chatbots. AI chatbots can simulate human conversation, provide personalized information, and interact with patients in real time. Their ease of use and conversational interface make them attractive for healthcare education, especially in resource-limited settings. We propose a prospective, single-masked, randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether an AI-based chatbot (ChatGPT) is non-inferior to standard counseling in terms of patients' adherence to pre-colonoscopy bowel preparation instructions and thus enhance the Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS). Patients undergoing colonoscopy (ntotal = 96) will be randomized to ChatGPT 4.0 Large Language Model (LLM)-aided Colonoscopy Counseling (NChatGPT = 48) or standard counseling (nsc = 48) arms at a 1:1 ratio using a central block randomization scheme of varying block sizes. In the first group, participants will interact with ChatGPT 4.0 for bowel preparation counseling before colonoscopy, whilst the second group will receive standard counseling from trained clinicians. Only the outcome assessors will be masked to the intervention allotment. The primary endpoint is the BBPS, assessed for non-inferiority. Secondary endpoints are patient anxiety (DASS-21) and patient satisfaction assessed using DASS-21 and PSQ-18 questionnaires, respectively and the findings will be reported descriptively with two-sided 95% confidence interval and any p-values will be considered exploratory without multiplicity adjustment. The primary endpoint data will be analyzed using the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and non-inferiority framework based on the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to control the confounders (age, gender (male as the risk factor), prior colonoscopy experience, colonoscopy indication, and baseline constipation score). The results will be compared with the findings based on the per-protocol (PP) analysis as part of the sensitivity analysis. The protocol adheres to SPIRIT 2025 and the SPIRIT-AI extension guidelines to ensure comprehensive reporting of this AI-based intervention. This trial has received ethics approval and the trial protocol has been registered with the clinicaltrials.gov registry (NCT06905782).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334349
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A prospective single-masked, non-inferiority, parallel-group randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of a ChatGPT-based AI chatbot to improve Boston bowel preparation scores for colonoscopy preparation: A trial protocol

Yamin Jie, Sheng Qian Yew, Muhammad Irfan Mohd Nazri, Muhammad Irfan Abdul Jalal et al.
PLoS ONE
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

A prospective single-masked, non-inferiority, parallel-group randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of a ChatGPT-based AI chatbot to improve Boston bowel preparation scores for colonoscopy preparation: A trial protocol

Yamin Jie, Sheng Qian Yew, Muhammad Irfan Mohd Nazri, Muhammad Irfan Abdul Jalal, Jacqueline A. Augustine, Nabil Mohammad Azmi, Siti Hamizah Mohd Ashar, Nagulan Ganeson
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare through tools like large language model chatbots. AI chatbots can simulate human conversation, provide personalized information, and interact with patients in real time. Their ease of use and conversational interface make them attractive for healthcare education, especially in resource-limited settings. We propose a prospective, single-masked, randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether an AI-based chatbot (ChatGPT) is non-inferior to standard counseling in terms of patients' adherence to pre-colonoscopy bowel preparation instructions and thus enhance the Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS). Patients undergoing colonoscopy (ntotal = 96) will be randomized to ChatGPT 4.0 Large Language Model (LLM)-aided Colonoscopy Counseling (NChatGPT = 48) or standard counseling (nsc = 48) arms at a 1:1 ratio using a central block randomization scheme of varying block sizes. In the first group, participants will interact with ChatGPT 4.0 for bowel preparation counseling before colonoscopy, whilst the second group will receive standard counseling from trained clinicians. Only the outcome assessors will be masked to the intervention allotment. The primary endpoint is the BBPS, assessed for non-inferiority. Secondary endpoints are patient anxiety (DASS-21) and patient satisfaction assessed using DASS-21 and PSQ-18 questionnaires, respectively and the findings will be reported descriptively with two-sided 95% confidence interval and any p-values will be considered exploratory without multiplicity adjustment. The primary endpoint data will be analyzed using the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and non-inferiority framework based on the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to control the confounders (age, gender (male as the risk factor), prior colonoscopy experience, colonoscopy indication, and baseline constipation score). The results will be compared with the findings based on the per-protocol (PP) analysis as part of the sensitivity analysis. The protocol adheres to SPIRIT 2025 and the SPIRIT-AI extension guidelines to ensure comprehensive reporting of this AI-based intervention. This trial has received ethics approval and the trial protocol has been registered with the clinicaltrials.gov registry (NCT06905782).

PLoS ONEVol. 20(10)
University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (MY), National University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.