Functions of coastal feeder bluff systems: Implications for prioritizing protection and restoration

Actively eroding cliffs, known as feeder bluffs, are important sources of sediment for coastal beaches. When shorelines have artificial armor, natural beach sediment processes can be disrupted. A recent management tool in the Salish Sea, WA, USA prioritizes efforts with high potential benefit of restoration (armor removal) or protection (preventing armor construction) to nearshore sediment supply. We conducted field sampling at 20 beaches identified as the highest or lowest priorities for restoration or protection, so we could examine local ecological and physical functions, in addition to potential landscape benefits. We sampled parameters spanning the top of the bluff to the low shore, and evaluated a total of 30 metrics including riparian vegetation, invertebrate assemblages, logs, beach wrack, fish abundance and behavior, surface epifauna and algae, beach and bluff characteristics, and sediment size and sorting. For analyses, we calculated an average score of beach function for each of four treatments: "Protect High" (unarmored, ranked as high management priority), "Protect Low" (unarmored, ranked low), "Restore High" (armored, ranked high), and "Restore Low" (armored, ranked low). Protect High and Low treatments were equivalent in local beach function, and both scored over twice as high as Restore treatments. Restore High scored only slightly higher than Restore Low, indicating a consistent degradation caused by armoring on bluffs with variable sediment source potential. Statistical models revealed that overall beach function may be largely driven by upper beach metrics including wrack, logs, and overhanging vegetation. Metrics for geomorphology and lower beach organisms were more variable, likely due to differences in geographical region and distance from the bluff. Our results indicate that beaches with natural unarmored bluffs have the highest level of localized ecological function regardless of the level of potential sediment supply, and restoring sediment supply processes at beaches with armored bluffs could double their ecological function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334742
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functions of coastal feeder bluff systems: Implications for prioritizing protection and restoration

Julia N. Kobelt, Megan N. Dethier, Jason D. Toft, A. S. Ogston et al.
PLoS ONE
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
article

Functions of coastal feeder bluff systems: Implications for prioritizing protection and restoration

Julia N. Kobelt, Megan N. Dethier, Jason D. Toft, A. S. Ogston, Kerry L. Accola, Sarah E. Vollero
article en

Abstract

Actively eroding cliffs, known as feeder bluffs, are important sources of sediment for coastal beaches. When shorelines have artificial armor, natural beach sediment processes can be disrupted. A recent management tool in the Salish Sea, WA, USA prioritizes efforts with high potential benefit of restoration (armor removal) or protection (preventing armor construction) to nearshore sediment supply. We conducted field sampling at 20 beaches identified as the highest or lowest priorities for restoration or protection, so we could examine local ecological and physical functions, in addition to potential landscape benefits. We sampled parameters spanning the top of the bluff to the low shore, and evaluated a total of 30 metrics including riparian vegetation, invertebrate assemblages, logs, beach wrack, fish abundance and behavior, surface epifauna and algae, beach and bluff characteristics, and sediment size and sorting. For analyses, we calculated an average score of beach function for each of four treatments: "Protect High" (unarmored, ranked as high management priority), "Protect Low" (unarmored, ranked low), "Restore High" (armored, ranked high), and "Restore Low" (armored, ranked low). Protect High and Low treatments were equivalent in local beach function, and both scored over twice as high as Restore treatments. Restore High scored only slightly higher than Restore Low, indicating a consistent degradation caused by armoring on bluffs with variable sediment source potential. Statistical models revealed that overall beach function may be largely driven by upper beach metrics including wrack, logs, and overhanging vegetation. Metrics for geomorphology and lower beach organisms were more variable, likely due to differences in geographical region and distance from the bluff. Our results indicate that beaches with natural unarmored bluffs have the highest level of localized ecological function regardless of the level of potential sediment supply, and restoring sediment supply processes at beaches with armored bluffs could double their ecological function.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(10)
University of Washington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.