Real-Time Detection Performance of RTSP vs. USB Cameras for UGVs

Real-time object detection is critical for ensuring the operational safety of unmanned ground vehicles (U G V s) in industrial inspection and last mile delivery applications, yet the impact of camera interface selection remains poorly understood. This study presents the first systematic comparison of USB web cams versus network cameras for UGV perception systems, focusing on safety critical scenarios including emergency braking and obstacle avoidance. Our experimen-tal results demonstrate that USB-based systems consistently outperform networked alternatives, offering superior frame processing efficiency, enhanced navigation precision during avoidance maneuvers, and significantly improved operational stability in prolonged deployments. These advantages are a result of USB's direct hardware interfacing and predictable low latency characteristics. The outcomes conclusively establish that for UGV applications, directly connected USB cameras provide more reliable vision performance, enabling robust collision avoidance in dynamic environments while maintaining exceptional tracking consistency and system robustness. Additionally, the study highlights the significant reduction in detection latency and jitter, which are important for real-time decision-making in fast-paced, safety in critical operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/wrcsara68202.2025.11194983
Primary Topic
Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-Time Detection Performance of RTSP vs. USB Cameras for UGVs

Somali Sikder, Fahim Abrar, Raheeb Sadman, Safwan Sattar Safi et al.
Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
article

Real-Time Detection Performance of RTSP vs. USB Cameras for UGVs

Somali Sikder, Fahim Abrar, Raheeb Sadman, Safwan Sattar Safi, Jahedul Alam Mahe, Sabrina Maliha, Mahadia Mashkura, Ahmad Ali Akand Anan
article en

Abstract

Real-time object detection is critical for ensuring the operational safety of unmanned ground vehicles (U G V s) in industrial inspection and last mile delivery applications, yet the impact of camera interface selection remains poorly understood. This study presents the first systematic comparison of USB web cams versus network cameras for UGV perception systems, focusing on safety critical scenarios including emergency braking and obstacle avoidance. Our experimen-tal results demonstrate that USB-based systems consistently outperform networked alternatives, offering superior frame processing efficiency, enhanced navigation precision during avoidance maneuvers, and significantly improved operational stability in prolonged deployments. These advantages are a result of USB's direct hardware interfacing and predictable low latency characteristics. The outcomes conclusively establish that for UGV applications, directly connected USB cameras provide more reliable vision performance, enabling robust collision avoidance in dynamic environments while maintaining exceptional tracking consistency and system robustness. Additionally, the study highlights the significant reduction in detection latency and jitter, which are important for real-time decision-making in fast-paced, safety in critical operations.

BRAC University (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Real-Time Detection Performance of RTSP vs. USB Cameras for UGVs — Somali Sikder, Fahim Abrar, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS