More than just a voice: how the OECD’s Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) Patient Advisory Panel drives action and results

More than just a voice 2 How the PaRIS Patient Advisory Panel drives action and results with the OECD's 3 Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS)person's day-to-day self-care, and it offers continuity and a whole-person view that specialist services often 8 lack.This makes it essential for delivering coordinated, people-centred care.9 Yet, until recently, the lived experiences of people with chronic conditions in primary care have not been 10 captured in a consistent, international way.Health systems are often evaluated by workforce numbers or 11 clinical indicators, not by how patients experience care.Even when collected, patient-reported data is 12 sometimes seen as secondary.13 Key questions remain unanswered: How do people perceive their health?How do outcomes and 14 experiences vary across groups?Which aspects of care matter most?Do patients feel heard?Without 15 comparable international data from the point of view of those experiencing care, an evidence-based, 16 comprehensive perspective has been lacking.17 The OECD's Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) addresses this gap.It embeds patient 18 involvement into every stage of the survey -design, implementation, and reporting.Over the past seven 19 years, the PaRIS Patient Advisory Panel (PaRIS-PP), made up of representatives from national and 20 international organisations, has shaped this process.While patient involvement in research is growing, 21 most examples remain episodic -tied to specific funding cycles or project timelines.Several countries 22 offer national frameworks for engagement, such as NIHR Involve (UK), SPOR (Canada), NHMRC 23 (Australia), and PCORI (USA).International organisations like the European Organisation for Research 24 and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement 25 (ICHOM) also involve patients, but typically focus on clinical research or outcomes measurement, not 26 system-level policy reform.In contrast, the PaRIS Patient Advisory Panel (PaRIS-PP) is embedded in an27international initiative designed to assess and improve primary care across health systems -a rare and 28 important shift.This paper outlines the practical impact of the PaRIS-PP's involvement and its implications 29 for policymakers, practitioners and policy researchers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IJQHC Communications
Published
2025-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijcoms/lyaf010
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

More than just a voice: how the OECD’s Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) Patient Advisory Panel drives action and results

Cristina Parsons Perez, Kent Cadogan Loftsgard, Rebecca Barlow-Noone, Elizabeth Deveny et al.
IJQHC Communications
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

More than just a voice: how the OECD’s Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) Patient Advisory Panel drives action and results

Cristina Parsons Perez, Kent Cadogan Loftsgard, Rebecca Barlow-Noone, Elizabeth Deveny, Cajsa Lindberg, Yann Heyer, Dani Mothci
article en

Abstract

More than just a voice 2 How the PaRIS Patient Advisory Panel drives action and results with the OECD's 3 Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS)person's day-to-day self-care, and it offers continuity and a whole-person view that specialist services often 8 lack.This makes it essential for delivering coordinated, people-centred care.9 Yet, until recently, the lived experiences of people with chronic conditions in primary care have not been 10 captured in a consistent, international way.Health systems are often evaluated by workforce numbers or 11 clinical indicators, not by how patients experience care.Even when collected, patient-reported data is 12 sometimes seen as secondary.13 Key questions remain unanswered: How do people perceive their health?How do outcomes and 14 experiences vary across groups?Which aspects of care matter most?Do patients feel heard?Without 15 comparable international data from the point of view of those experiencing care, an evidence-based, 16 comprehensive perspective has been lacking.17 The OECD's Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) addresses this gap.It embeds patient 18 involvement into every stage of the survey -design, implementation, and reporting.Over the past seven 19 years, the PaRIS Patient Advisory Panel (PaRIS-PP), made up of representatives from national and 20 international organisations, has shaped this process.While patient involvement in research is growing, 21 most examples remain episodic -tied to specific funding cycles or project timelines.Several countries 22 offer national frameworks for engagement, such as NIHR Involve (UK), SPOR (Canada), NHMRC 23 (Australia), and PCORI (USA).International organisations like the European Organisation for Research 24 and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement 25 (ICHOM) also involve patients, but typically focus on clinical research or outcomes measurement, not 26 system-level policy reform.In contrast, the PaRIS Patient Advisory Panel (PaRIS-PP) is embedded in an27international initiative designed to assess and improve primary care across health systems -a rare and 28 important shift.This paper outlines the practical impact of the PaRIS-PP's involvement and its implications 29 for policymakers, practitioners and policy researchers.

IJQHC CommunicationsVol. 6(1)
Consumers Union (US), Gavi (CH), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CA), Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (CH), Iseal Alliance (GB), Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CA), European Patients Forum (LU), Alliance for Public Health (UA), The Patients Association (GB), Digital Research Alliance of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.