Bears like us: Blurring species boundaries through embodied experiences of museum skeleton specimen preparation

Though regional Indigenous concepts of nonhuman personhood have always known that bears are people, traditional Western museum specimen collections reify differences between humans and bears that embodied experiences contradict. The interspecies material blurriness of bone and flesh makes specimen preparation an interesting site of sensory decolonization of museum collections. This paper uses ethnographic engagement with the skeleton preparation process at the Pratt Museum in Homer, Alaska, to evidence how engagement with animal bones can produce cross-species self-recognition. Through analysis of Lee Post's skeleton preparation methodology, notebooks and experiences from 2001–2003 summer education programs, and the author's personal experiences, this paper provides ethnographic description of the impact of specimen preparation on embodied “zoomimetic” awareness. The history of Western anatomy and medicine contextualizes how animal interiors delineate anxiety over human relationships to nature. Bears’ physical similarities to humans lend uncanniness to settler-bear interactions, which extends to their material bodies. Reference specimens in museums create expert objects that textualize the subtle differences between bears and humans, and the processing of animal bones through cleaning, boiling, and chemical soaking, serve to “overmine” bone to reveal these differences. Volunteer students of the Pratt's “Summer Adventure Program” experienced recognition of similarities between a black bear and their own bodies, enhanced by the haptic attention of drawing and the identification of pathological indices of the individual life experiences of “Wiley” the bear. The production of the bear skeleton specimen as a clear, detailed material which would maintain traditional Western museum boundary between species instead creates opportunity to subvert anthropocentrism and recognize shared interiors and individuality of bearkind.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Material Culture
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13591835251384875
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bears like us: Blurring species boundaries through embodied experiences of museum skeleton specimen preparation

Hannah Bradley
Journal of Material Culture
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Bears like us: Blurring species boundaries through embodied experiences of museum skeleton specimen preparation

Hannah Bradley
article en

Abstract

Though regional Indigenous concepts of nonhuman personhood have always known that bears are people, traditional Western museum specimen collections reify differences between humans and bears that embodied experiences contradict. The interspecies material blurriness of bone and flesh makes specimen preparation an interesting site of sensory decolonization of museum collections. This paper uses ethnographic engagement with the skeleton preparation process at the Pratt Museum in Homer, Alaska, to evidence how engagement with animal bones can produce cross-species self-recognition. Through analysis of Lee Post's skeleton preparation methodology, notebooks and experiences from 2001–2003 summer education programs, and the author's personal experiences, this paper provides ethnographic description of the impact of specimen preparation on embodied “zoomimetic” awareness. The history of Western anatomy and medicine contextualizes how animal interiors delineate anxiety over human relationships to nature. Bears’ physical similarities to humans lend uncanniness to settler-bear interactions, which extends to their material bodies. Reference specimens in museums create expert objects that textualize the subtle differences between bears and humans, and the processing of animal bones through cleaning, boiling, and chemical soaking, serve to “overmine” bone to reveal these differences. Volunteer students of the Pratt's “Summer Adventure Program” experienced recognition of similarities between a black bear and their own bodies, enhanced by the haptic attention of drawing and the identification of pathological indices of the individual life experiences of “Wiley” the bear. The production of the bear skeleton specimen as a clear, detailed material which would maintain traditional Western museum boundary between species instead creates opportunity to subvert anthropocentrism and recognize shared interiors and individuality of bearkind.

Journal of Material CultureVol. 30(4)
Princeton University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bears like us: Blurring species boundaries through embodied experiences of museum skeleton specimen preparation — Hannah Bradley · Journal of Material Culture (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS