Machine learning and nanoparticles for enhancing condensate recovery in gas condensate reservoirs

Abstract Condensate buildup near the wellbore during gas production leads to reduced gas flow and decreased reservoir productivity. This study presents a hybrid approach that integrates experimental wettability alteration using nanoparticles (SiO 2 , CaCO 3 , Al 2 O 3 ) with advanced machine learning (ML) models to enhance condensate recovery in gas condensate reservoirs. Laboratory core flooding experiments were conducted under reservoir‐representative conditions, and the resulting datasets were analyzed using six ML algorithms: support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), linear regression (LR), least squares boosting (LSBoost), and Bayesian methods. Among all models, SVM demonstrated the highest predictive performance across all nanoparticle types. For CaCO 3 , the model achieved R 2 = 0.998, RMSE = 0.473, and MAPE = 0.491% under residual condensate saturation (Re), and R 2 = 0.987, RMSE = 0.258, MAPE = 2.458% under residual oil saturation (Sor) conditions. For SiO 2 , SVM yielded R 2 = 0.997, RMSE = 0.569, MAPE = 0.551% (Re) and R 2 = 0.991, RMSE = 0.569, MAPE = 0.551% (Sor). For Al 2 O 3 , the model obtained R 2 = 0.978, RMSE = 1.776, MAPE = 1.682% (Re) and R 2 = 0.966, RMSE = 0.725, MAPE = 4.762% (Sor). Overall, CaCO 3 nanoparticles provided the highest recovery enhancement, improving condensate recovery by up to 18%. The integration of nanoparticle‐assisted EOR with ML‐based prediction offers a powerful strategy for optimizing recovery in complex gas condensate reservoirs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.70119
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning and nanoparticles for enhancing condensate recovery in gas condensate reservoirs

Yousef Kazemzadeh, Fatemeh Seifi, Soroush Ahmadi, Ali Akbari
The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
article

Machine learning and nanoparticles for enhancing condensate recovery in gas condensate reservoirs

Yousef Kazemzadeh, Fatemeh Seifi, Soroush Ahmadi, Ali Akbari
article en

Abstract

Abstract Condensate buildup near the wellbore during gas production leads to reduced gas flow and decreased reservoir productivity. This study presents a hybrid approach that integrates experimental wettability alteration using nanoparticles (SiO 2 , CaCO 3 , Al 2 O 3 ) with advanced machine learning (ML) models to enhance condensate recovery in gas condensate reservoirs. Laboratory core flooding experiments were conducted under reservoir‐representative conditions, and the resulting datasets were analyzed using six ML algorithms: support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), linear regression (LR), least squares boosting (LSBoost), and Bayesian methods. Among all models, SVM demonstrated the highest predictive performance across all nanoparticle types. For CaCO 3 , the model achieved R 2 = 0.998, RMSE = 0.473, and MAPE = 0.491% under residual condensate saturation (Re), and R 2 = 0.987, RMSE = 0.258, MAPE = 2.458% under residual oil saturation (Sor) conditions. For SiO 2 , SVM yielded R 2 = 0.997, RMSE = 0.569, MAPE = 0.551% (Re) and R 2 = 0.991, RMSE = 0.569, MAPE = 0.551% (Sor). For Al 2 O 3 , the model obtained R 2 = 0.978, RMSE = 1.776, MAPE = 1.682% (Re) and R 2 = 0.966, RMSE = 0.725, MAPE = 4.762% (Sor). Overall, CaCO 3 nanoparticles provided the highest recovery enhancement, improving condensate recovery by up to 18%. The integration of nanoparticle‐assisted EOR with ML‐based prediction offers a powerful strategy for optimizing recovery in complex gas condensate reservoirs.

The Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringVol. 104(4)
Persian Gulf University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.