NetzDG on Twitter: A Social Network Analysis of Stakeholders in Public Discourse About Platform Regulation in Germany

ABSTRACT This paper examines the Twitter debate about the German anti‐hate‐speech law, the Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz (NetzDG). Public discourse on this law has been contentious, with opponents cautioning against the risk of censorship and supporters emphasizing that NetzDG is necessary to protect democracy. Tweets provide valuable insights into the stakeholders, topics, and communicative practices that have shaped this discussion about platform regulation and free speech. Our research investigates the most retweeted accounts mentioning NetzDG and considers their influence on the discussion. It reveals the existence of two clusters with strong political identities: one connected to the right‐wing party Alternative für Deutschland and one linked to the liberal Freie Demokratische Partei. A third cluster consists of media and technology stakeholders. Key takeaways are the significant role played by “alternative” right‐wing media and specialized IT websites in some clusters and the central position of legal experts in all groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy & Internet
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.70016
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NetzDG on Twitter: A Social Network Analysis of Stakeholders in Public Discourse About Platform Regulation in Germany

Caio Mello, Patrick Zerrer, Jens Pohlmann, Karin León Henneberg
Policy & Internet
Social Media and Politics
article

NetzDG on Twitter: A Social Network Analysis of Stakeholders in Public Discourse About Platform Regulation in Germany

Caio Mello, Patrick Zerrer, Jens Pohlmann, Karin León Henneberg
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the Twitter debate about the German anti‐hate‐speech law, the Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz (NetzDG). Public discourse on this law has been contentious, with opponents cautioning against the risk of censorship and supporters emphasizing that NetzDG is necessary to protect democracy. Tweets provide valuable insights into the stakeholders, topics, and communicative practices that have shaped this discussion about platform regulation and free speech. Our research investigates the most retweeted accounts mentioning NetzDG and considers their influence on the discussion. It reveals the existence of two clusters with strong political identities: one connected to the right‐wing party Alternative für Deutschland and one linked to the liberal Freie Demokratische Partei. A third cluster consists of media and technology stakeholders. Key takeaways are the significant role played by “alternative” right‐wing media and specialized IT websites in some clusters and the central position of legal experts in all groups.

Policy & InternetVol. 17(4)
University of Bremen (DE), University of Luxembourg (LU), Institute for Information Management Bremen (DE), Arbed (Luxembourg) (LU), Luxembourg Centre for Contemporary and Digital History (LU), University of California, Davis (US)
Universität Bremen
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.