Carbon storage portfolios for the transition to net zero
<h2>Summary</h2> Net-zero targets are widely adopted by companies and countries worldwide. To achieve these goals, more companies are investing in diverse carbon removal portfolios. This study develops a new risk management framework that combines forestry, biochar, and geological storage offsets into portfolios that could stabilize global temperatures over multi-century time periods. We find that if a carbon storage portfolio reaches an equilibrium state of CO<sub>2</sub> stored, it can be leveraged to stabilize global temperatures by increasing the size of the portfolio relative to the amount of removal claimed. For moderate-risk primarily forestry portfolios retaining 0.75–0.55 tCO<sub>2</sub> of the 1 tCO<sub>2</sub> stored, an additional 0.30–0.80 tCO<sub>2</sub> removal is needed to offset re-releases over 1,000 years. High-risk portfolios retaining only 0.10 tCO<sub>2</sub> require over 9 tCO<sub>2</sub> additional removal. Portfolios that are predicted to re-release almost all CO<sub>2</sub> cannot be leveraged and are ineffective at meeting temperature stabilization goals. These findings have implications for policy and corporate climate action.
Authors
- Conor Hickey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7611-562X)
- Stuart Jenkins (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2284-0302)
- Myles Allen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1721-7172)
Institutions
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Harvard University Press (US)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Joule
- Published
- 2025-10-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2025.102164
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.13
Funders
- Harvard Business School
- University of Oxford
- European Commission