Test-Retest Reliability of a Neuromuscular-Cognitive Assessment Battery, Without and With a Rucksack
Overall, there was good agreement between visits 1 and 2 on the neuromuscular-cognitive assessment test with and without a rucksack. However, some variables showed some variability, with conflicting bias and CCCs. This must be considered as clinicians integrate and interpret neuromuscular-cognitive assessment test results.
Authors
- Bridget Carroll (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6293-3532)
- Matthew C. Hoch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6268-1804)
- Danielle M. Torp (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0223-5909)
- Ke’La H. Porter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7000-8054)
- Nicholas R. Heebner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6916-2735)
- Reiley T. Bergin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5771-033X)
- Molly Taylor
- C. Andrew Robinson
Institutions
- University of Kentucky (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Military Medicine
- Published
- 2025-10-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf493
- Primary Topic
- Sports Performance and Training
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00