Unraveling learning characteristics of transformer models for molecular design

In drug design, transformer networks adopted from natural language processing are applied in a variety of ways. We have used sequence-based generative compound design as a model system to explore the learning characteristics of transformers and determine if these models learned information relevant for protein-ligand interactions. The analysis reveals that sequence-based predictions of active compounds using transformer models required a proportion of at least ∼60% of the original test sequences. Moreover, predictions depended on sequence and compound similarity of training and test data and on compound memorization effects. The predictions were purely statistically driven by associating sequence patterns with molecular structures, thus rationalizing their strict dependence on detectable similarities. Moreover, the transformer models did not learn target sequence information relevant for ligand binding. While the results do not call sequence-based compound design approaches generally into question, they caution against over-interpretation of transformer models used for such applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Patterns
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2025.101392
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unraveling learning characteristics of transformer models for molecular design

Jannik P. Roth, Jürgen Bajorath
2 citations
Patterns
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
3.01
article

Unraveling learning characteristics of transformer models for molecular design

Jannik P. Roth, Jürgen Bajorath
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In drug design, transformer networks adopted from natural language processing are applied in a variety of ways. We have used sequence-based generative compound design as a model system to explore the learning characteristics of transformers and determine if these models learned information relevant for protein-ligand interactions. The analysis reveals that sequence-based predictions of active compounds using transformer models required a proportion of at least ∼60% of the original test sequences. Moreover, predictions depended on sequence and compound similarity of training and test data and on compound memorization effects. The predictions were purely statistically driven by associating sequence patterns with molecular structures, thus rationalizing their strict dependence on detectable similarities. Moreover, the transformer models did not learn target sequence information relevant for ligand binding. While the results do not call sequence-based compound design approaches generally into question, they caution against over-interpretation of transformer models used for such applications.

PatternsVol. 6(12)
University of Bonn (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
3.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unraveling learning characteristics of transformer models for molecular design — Jannik P. Roth, Jürgen Bajorath · Patterns (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS