Key practices affecting the environmental impact of Ewe milk in mixed farming systems

This study examined management practices in twelve Mediterranean mixed dairy sheep farms to identify key drivers of environmental impacts associated with milk production. Using life cycle assessment and multivariate analysis, the study explored correlations between farm management practices and environmental outcomes. The average annual milk production was consistent with existing literature, reaching 190 kg of fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) per ewe. The correlation analysis revealed a general trend indicating that the various impacts considered, such as atmospheric emissions, acidification, and eutrophication, increased proportionally. Specifically, a greater reliance on concentrates for animal supplementation was linked to higher environmental impacts, suggesting that the use of purchased feeds tends to worsen the environmental performance of mixed dairy sheep farms. Principal component analysis further highlighted that environmental impacts were positively correlated with increased electricity consumption and higher fuel use per hectare. Conversely, grazing practices were associated with reduced environmental impacts, emphasizing the advantages of pasture mass as an energy-rich feed source in contexts where preserved forages are of poor quality due to adverse climate conditions. Regarding global warming potential (GWP), the study found that enteric methane emissions from ruminants accounted for over 53.5% of total emissions. The average GWP was estimated at 4.2 kg CO 2 eq kg -1 of FPCM. The use of detailed equations for estimating biogenic GWP underscored the importance of accurate data collection on livestock characteristics, diet composition, intake, and feeding duration. • The study applies LCA and multivariate statistical analysis to identify key management practices influencing environmental impacts of dairy sheep crop-livestock mixed farms. • Enteric methane emissions account for over 53.5% of total emissions, emphasizing the importance of precise estimates based on detailed data of animal diet and flock management • The use of purchased concentrates in sheep diets is associated with increased greenhouse gas emissions and other impact categories in mixed farming systems. • Producing high-quality forages with temporary grassland instead of annual ley and increasing on-farm cereal production for supplements can reduce environmental impacts of ewe milk • In the selected Mediterranean sheep farms, greater grazing time during lactation is correlated with a general reduction in environmental impacts per kg of fat and protein corrected milk

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100353
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Key practices affecting the environmental impact of Ewe milk in mixed farming systems

Francesca Vichi, G. Conte, Marcello Mele, Alice Cappucci et al.
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Key practices affecting the environmental impact of Ewe milk in mixed farming systems

Francesca Vichi, G. Conte, Marcello Mele, Alice Cappucci, Alberto Mantino, Ricardo Villani, Fabrizio Giuseppe Cella, Matteo Finocchi
article en

Abstract

This study examined management practices in twelve Mediterranean mixed dairy sheep farms to identify key drivers of environmental impacts associated with milk production. Using life cycle assessment and multivariate analysis, the study explored correlations between farm management practices and environmental outcomes. The average annual milk production was consistent with existing literature, reaching 190 kg of fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) per ewe. The correlation analysis revealed a general trend indicating that the various impacts considered, such as atmospheric emissions, acidification, and eutrophication, increased proportionally. Specifically, a greater reliance on concentrates for animal supplementation was linked to higher environmental impacts, suggesting that the use of purchased feeds tends to worsen the environmental performance of mixed dairy sheep farms. Principal component analysis further highlighted that environmental impacts were positively correlated with increased electricity consumption and higher fuel use per hectare. Conversely, grazing practices were associated with reduced environmental impacts, emphasizing the advantages of pasture mass as an energy-rich feed source in contexts where preserved forages are of poor quality due to adverse climate conditions. Regarding global warming potential (GWP), the study found that enteric methane emissions from ruminants accounted for over 53.5% of total emissions. The average GWP was estimated at 4.2 kg CO 2 eq kg -1 of FPCM. The use of detailed equations for estimating biogenic GWP underscored the importance of accurate data collection on livestock characteristics, diet composition, intake, and feeding duration. • The study applies LCA and multivariate statistical analysis to identify key management practices influencing environmental impacts of dairy sheep crop-livestock mixed farms. • Enteric methane emissions account for over 53.5% of total emissions, emphasizing the importance of precise estimates based on detailed data of animal diet and flock management • The use of purchased concentrates in sheep diets is associated with increased greenhouse gas emissions and other impact categories in mixed farming systems. • Producing high-quality forages with temporary grassland instead of annual ley and increasing on-farm cereal production for supplements can reduce environmental impacts of ewe milk • In the selected Mediterranean sheep farms, greater grazing time during lactation is correlated with a general reduction in environmental impacts per kg of fat and protein corrected milk

Cleaner Environmental SystemsVol. 19
University of Pisa (IT), Piaggio (Italy) (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.