The effect of infill type ratio on strength of PLA and ABS thermoplastics

This study investigates the effect of honeycomb infill density on the tensile strength of 3D-printed specimens fabricated using Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) technology with PLA (Polylactic Acid) and ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene) thermoplastics. The motivation for this work stems from the increasing demand for lightweight polymer components in engineering applications, where reliable tensile performance is critical for structural safety. Although honeycomb structures are traditionally preferred for compression-dominated applications such as heels, heat exchangers, and lightweight cores, they are also increasingly employed in tensile load-bearing components such as lightweight brackets, connecting links, prosthetic parts, and aerospace/automotive fixtures. Understanding their tensile properties is therefore essential for effective design. Specimens with infill densities ranging from 15 % to 100 % were modeled in CATIA V5 and analyzed in ANSYS R21 using a honeycomb (hexagonal) pattern. Tensile strength was evaluated for each density and compared against ASTM E8 tensile properties of plastics. Results show that PLA specimens achieved a maximum tensile strength of 60.02 MPa at 100 % infill, while ABS specimens reached 52.54 MPa. Strength improvement from 15 % to 100 % infill was approximately 60–70 %. PLA exhibited superior stiffness and strength, making it suitable for tensile applications, whereas ABS showed higher strain and deformability. The findings confirm that infill density is a key parameter influencing the tensile performance of thermoplastic parts produced by FDM.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Science Talks
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sctalk.2025.100496
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of infill type ratio on strength of PLA and ABS thermoplastics

Karnati Narasimha, Kunhikrishnan Lakshmi, B Surya
Science Talks
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

The effect of infill type ratio on strength of PLA and ABS thermoplastics

Karnati Narasimha, Kunhikrishnan Lakshmi, B Surya
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of honeycomb infill density on the tensile strength of 3D-printed specimens fabricated using Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) technology with PLA (Polylactic Acid) and ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene) thermoplastics. The motivation for this work stems from the increasing demand for lightweight polymer components in engineering applications, where reliable tensile performance is critical for structural safety. Although honeycomb structures are traditionally preferred for compression-dominated applications such as heels, heat exchangers, and lightweight cores, they are also increasingly employed in tensile load-bearing components such as lightweight brackets, connecting links, prosthetic parts, and aerospace/automotive fixtures. Understanding their tensile properties is therefore essential for effective design. Specimens with infill densities ranging from 15 % to 100 % were modeled in CATIA V5 and analyzed in ANSYS R21 using a honeycomb (hexagonal) pattern. Tensile strength was evaluated for each density and compared against ASTM E8 tensile properties of plastics. Results show that PLA specimens achieved a maximum tensile strength of 60.02 MPa at 100 % infill, while ABS specimens reached 52.54 MPa. Strength improvement from 15 % to 100 % infill was approximately 60–70 %. PLA exhibited superior stiffness and strength, making it suitable for tensile applications, whereas ABS showed higher strain and deformability. The findings confirm that infill density is a key parameter influencing the tensile performance of thermoplastic parts produced by FDM.

Science TalksVol. 16
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.