The “angle” method of calculating glenoid bone loss: a validation study and review of current methods

The "angle" method of calculating glenoid bone loss predicts a 5.4% decreased absolute bone loss than the commonly used "best-fit circle" method and shows high intra-rater reliability, with a correlation coefficient of 0.965-0.995.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JSES International
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2025.09.014
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The “angle” method of calculating glenoid bone loss: a validation study and review of current methods

Lewis L. Shi, Nicholas H. Maassen, James MacLeod, M. Brady Allen
JSES International
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

The “angle” method of calculating glenoid bone loss: a validation study and review of current methods

Lewis L. Shi, Nicholas H. Maassen, James MacLeod, M. Brady Allen
article en

Abstract

The "angle" method of calculating glenoid bone loss predicts a 5.4% decreased absolute bone loss than the commonly used "best-fit circle" method and shows high intra-rater reliability, with a correlation coefficient of 0.965-0.995.

JSES InternationalVol. 10(1)
Medical College of Wisconsin (US), University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.