Social responsibility and the brand of a State University: new approaches to positioning

This article explores approaches to building a university brand in the context of strategic positioning in higher education. The author examine’s three dominant brand strategies used by universities worldwide: mission-driven, product-driven, and consumer-driven. Through a comparative analysis of leading Russian (MGIMO, MSU) and international universities (MIT, Harvard, Princeton, Yale), the paper highlights the unique identity formation processes of academic institutions based on their mission, research output, and engagement with stakeholders. The authors further apply a market-based brand classification model – including Leadership, Challenger, Differentiation, Niche, and Follower strategies – derived from Gilligan Wilson’s marketing framework. Using the case of the Russian State University for the Humanities (RSUH), the authors propose a step-by-step algorithm for developing a university positioning concept. The algorithm integrates the analysis of the university’s educational, research, and innovation models, corporate culture, and academic reputation. Based on this assessment, the Differentiation strategy is identified as optimal for RSUH, taking into account the university’s diverse educational portfolio and its humanities-focused identity. The article also presents methods for communicating the brand to key stakeholders through the Hero–Hub–Hygiene content model and an inverted funnel approach – both aimed at enhancing student experience and generating organic brand advocacy. The study concludes that in a competitive educational market, effective brand formation requires a coherent strategy rooted in the institution’s mission, supported by measurable strengths, and communicated through emotionally resonant and evidence-based messaging. The authors argue that positioning a university not simply as a provider of education but as a visionary institution addressing future societal challenges is crucial for long-term relevance and differentiation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociopolitical sciences
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2025-15-4-106-116
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social responsibility and the brand of a State University: new approaches to positioning

Elena Nasyrova
Sociopolitical sciences
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Social responsibility and the brand of a State University: new approaches to positioning

Elena Nasyrova
article en

Abstract

This article explores approaches to building a university brand in the context of strategic positioning in higher education. The author examine’s three dominant brand strategies used by universities worldwide: mission-driven, product-driven, and consumer-driven. Through a comparative analysis of leading Russian (MGIMO, MSU) and international universities (MIT, Harvard, Princeton, Yale), the paper highlights the unique identity formation processes of academic institutions based on their mission, research output, and engagement with stakeholders. The authors further apply a market-based brand classification model – including Leadership, Challenger, Differentiation, Niche, and Follower strategies – derived from Gilligan Wilson’s marketing framework. Using the case of the Russian State University for the Humanities (RSUH), the authors propose a step-by-step algorithm for developing a university positioning concept. The algorithm integrates the analysis of the university’s educational, research, and innovation models, corporate culture, and academic reputation. Based on this assessment, the Differentiation strategy is identified as optimal for RSUH, taking into account the university’s diverse educational portfolio and its humanities-focused identity. The article also presents methods for communicating the brand to key stakeholders through the Hero–Hub–Hygiene content model and an inverted funnel approach – both aimed at enhancing student experience and generating organic brand advocacy. The study concludes that in a competitive educational market, effective brand formation requires a coherent strategy rooted in the institution’s mission, supported by measurable strengths, and communicated through emotionally resonant and evidence-based messaging. The authors argue that positioning a university not simply as a provider of education but as a visionary institution addressing future societal challenges is crucial for long-term relevance and differentiation.

Sociopolitical sciencesVol. 15(4)
Russian State University for the Humanities (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Social responsibility and the brand of a State University: new approaches to positioning — Elena Nasyrova · Sociopolitical sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS