Trusted knowledge extraction for operations and maintenance intelligence

• Released OMIn, the first open-source dataset for maintenance knowledge extraction. • Evaluated 16 NLP tools for zero-shot performance on real-world maintenance data. • Identified domain-specific challenges limiting NLP tool accuracy and robustness. • Assessed tool readiness and trust for mission-critical maintenance applications. Deriving operational intelligence from organizational data repositories is a key challenge due to the dichotomy of data confidentiality vs data integration objectives, as well as the limitations of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools relative to the specific knowledge structure of domains such as operations and maintenance. In this work, we discuss Knowledge Graph construction and break down the Knowledge Extraction process into its Named Entity Recognition, Coreference Resolution, Named Entity Linking, and Relation Extraction functional components. We then evaluate sixteen NLP tools in concert with or in comparison to the rapidly advancing capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). We focus on the operational and maintenance intelligence use case for trusted applications in the aircraft industry. A baseline dataset is derived from a rich public domain US Federal Aviation Administration dataset focused on equipment failures or maintenance requirements. We assess the zero-shot performance of NLP and LLM tools that can be operated within a controlled, confidential environment (no data is sent to third parties). Based on our observation of significant performance limitations, we discuss the challenges related to trusted NLP and LLM tools as well as their Technical Readiness Level for wider use in mission-critical industries such as aviation. We conclude with recommendations to enhance trust and provide our open-source curated dataset to support further baseline testing and evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural Language Processing Journal
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlp.2025.100187
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trusted knowledge extraction for operations and maintenance intelligence

Paul Brenner, Charles Vardeman, Kathleen P. Mealey, Jonathan A. Karr et al.
Natural Language Processing Journal
Data Quality and Management
article

Trusted knowledge extraction for operations and maintenance intelligence

Paul Brenner, Charles Vardeman, Kathleen P. Mealey, Jonathan A. Karr, Priscila Saboia Moreira
article en

Abstract

• Released OMIn, the first open-source dataset for maintenance knowledge extraction. • Evaluated 16 NLP tools for zero-shot performance on real-world maintenance data. • Identified domain-specific challenges limiting NLP tool accuracy and robustness. • Assessed tool readiness and trust for mission-critical maintenance applications. Deriving operational intelligence from organizational data repositories is a key challenge due to the dichotomy of data confidentiality vs data integration objectives, as well as the limitations of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools relative to the specific knowledge structure of domains such as operations and maintenance. In this work, we discuss Knowledge Graph construction and break down the Knowledge Extraction process into its Named Entity Recognition, Coreference Resolution, Named Entity Linking, and Relation Extraction functional components. We then evaluate sixteen NLP tools in concert with or in comparison to the rapidly advancing capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). We focus on the operational and maintenance intelligence use case for trusted applications in the aircraft industry. A baseline dataset is derived from a rich public domain US Federal Aviation Administration dataset focused on equipment failures or maintenance requirements. We assess the zero-shot performance of NLP and LLM tools that can be operated within a controlled, confidential environment (no data is sent to third parties). Based on our observation of significant performance limitations, we discuss the challenges related to trusted NLP and LLM tools as well as their Technical Readiness Level for wider use in mission-critical industries such as aviation. We conclude with recommendations to enhance trust and provide our open-source curated dataset to support further baseline testing and evaluation.

Natural Language Processing JournalVol. 13
University of Notre Dame (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Data Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trusted knowledge extraction for operations and maintenance intelligence — Paul Brenner, Charles Vardeman, et al. · Natural Language Processing Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS