Which Matrix Adjectives License Which Types of Claus al Complements?

This study addresses the research question: Which types of predicate adjectives license which types of clausal complements? As a possible answer, it is proposed that predicate adjectives encode the linguistic senses of actuality, volition, and emotion through a review of previous studies on adjectival clausal complements. Accordingly, predicate adjectives can be classified into three major types in terms of their syntactic and semantic properties: factual adjectives, volitional adjectives, and emotional adjectives. Each type is further subdivided into two categories: presupposing vs. asserting adjectives (factual), subjective vs. objective adjectives (volitional), and experiential vs. stimulative adjectives (emotional). The relationship between predicate adjectives and their clausal complements is theoretically supported by applying this classification to actual linguistic data. In order to explore the applicability of the three types of adjectives in classroom settings, the study suggests sentence conversion tests, which consist of critical adjectival clausal complements representing each type. By implementing these tests, it becomes possible to diagnose not only which types of complements learners are able to produce at this stage and what errors they tend to make, but also to determine what types should be presented to them next, thus providing valuable insight into timely remedies and tailored teaching for learners.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in English Education
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22275/see.30.3.08
Primary Topic
Law, logistics, and international trade
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which Matrix Adjectives License Which Types of Claus al Complements?

Yong-myeong Kim
Studies in English Education
Law, logistics, and international trade
article

Which Matrix Adjectives License Which Types of Claus al Complements?

Yong-myeong Kim
article en

Abstract

This study addresses the research question: Which types of predicate adjectives license which types of clausal complements? As a possible answer, it is proposed that predicate adjectives encode the linguistic senses of actuality, volition, and emotion through a review of previous studies on adjectival clausal complements. Accordingly, predicate adjectives can be classified into three major types in terms of their syntactic and semantic properties: factual adjectives, volitional adjectives, and emotional adjectives. Each type is further subdivided into two categories: presupposing vs. asserting adjectives (factual), subjective vs. objective adjectives (volitional), and experiential vs. stimulative adjectives (emotional). The relationship between predicate adjectives and their clausal complements is theoretically supported by applying this classification to actual linguistic data. In order to explore the applicability of the three types of adjectives in classroom settings, the study suggests sentence conversion tests, which consist of critical adjectival clausal complements representing each type. By implementing these tests, it becomes possible to diagnose not only which types of complements learners are able to produce at this stage and what errors they tend to make, but also to determine what types should be presented to them next, thus providing valuable insight into timely remedies and tailored teaching for learners.

Studies in English EducationVol. 30(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Law, logistics, and international trade
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.