Does treating emotional memories come at a price? Effects of single-session EMDR, imaginal exposure, and imagery rescripting on forced-choice recognition of event details in healthy adults – a laboratory study

Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), Imaginal Exposure (IE), and Imagery Rescripting (ImRs) are effective trauma-focused interventions. However, concerns persist that they may impair the accuracy of memories addressed in treatment. This laboratory study tested whether a single session of EMDR, IE, or ImRs affects forced-choice recognition in healthy adults. Two hundred sixty-five participants underwent the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) and received EMDR, IE, ImRs, or no intervention (NIC) the following day. One week later, memory for the TSST was assessed using a forced-choice recognition task (one target; three plausible foils). Contrary to expectations, the interventions did not differentially affect recognition performance; the number of correct answers was comparable to NIC across intervention groups. For ImRs and IE, this aligns with recent findings suggesting that they do not impair recognition memory. For EMDR, prior experimental studies linked eye movements to poorer delayed free recall, stimulus discrimination, and yes/no recognition. Here, we observed no impairment in delayed forced-choice recognition, suggesting that previously reported negative effects may not generalize across memory outcomes or task formats. Overall, these findings indicate that trauma-focused interventions do not carry a general risk of memory impairment. However, conclusions are limited by the laboratory analogue design, exclusive reliance on a recognition task, and the absence of treatment-integrity checks, which raises the possibility that null effects reflect limited intervention effectiveness. Future research should specify conditions under which these interventions may pose risks, clarify mechanisms underlying task- and memory-specific effects, and examine how findings generalize to clinical populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2025.104884
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does treating emotional memories come at a price? Effects of single-session EMDR, imaginal exposure, and imagery rescripting on forced-choice recognition of event details in healthy adults – a laboratory study

Milena Aleksic, Thomas Ehring, Anna E. Kunze, Larissa Wolkenstein
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Memory Processes and Influences
article

Does treating emotional memories come at a price? Effects of single-session EMDR, imaginal exposure, and imagery rescripting on forced-choice recognition of event details in healthy adults – a laboratory study

Milena Aleksic, Thomas Ehring, Anna E. Kunze, Larissa Wolkenstein
article en

Abstract

Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), Imaginal Exposure (IE), and Imagery Rescripting (ImRs) are effective trauma-focused interventions. However, concerns persist that they may impair the accuracy of memories addressed in treatment. This laboratory study tested whether a single session of EMDR, IE, or ImRs affects forced-choice recognition in healthy adults. Two hundred sixty-five participants underwent the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) and received EMDR, IE, ImRs, or no intervention (NIC) the following day. One week later, memory for the TSST was assessed using a forced-choice recognition task (one target; three plausible foils). Contrary to expectations, the interventions did not differentially affect recognition performance; the number of correct answers was comparable to NIC across intervention groups. For ImRs and IE, this aligns with recent findings suggesting that they do not impair recognition memory. For EMDR, prior experimental studies linked eye movements to poorer delayed free recall, stimulus discrimination, and yes/no recognition. Here, we observed no impairment in delayed forced-choice recognition, suggesting that previously reported negative effects may not generalize across memory outcomes or task formats. Overall, these findings indicate that trauma-focused interventions do not carry a general risk of memory impairment. However, conclusions are limited by the laboratory analogue design, exclusive reliance on a recognition task, and the absence of treatment-integrity checks, which raises the possibility that null effects reflect limited intervention effectiveness. Future research should specify conditions under which these interventions may pose risks, clarify mechanisms underlying task- and memory-specific effects, and examine how findings generalize to clinical populations.

Behaviour Research and TherapyVol. 195
LMU Klinikum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.