Optimizing point count survey locations with viewshed analysis and integer programming: A geospatial approach to wildlife detectability

Point counts are a common method for measuring wildlife abundance, but their accuracy can be limited by detectability biases influenced by observer location and environmental conditions. We present a geospatial approach integrating viewshed analysis with spatial optimization methods to optimize survey point placement and improve detectability estimates. We quantified visibility based upon both terrain-only and LiDAR enhanced viewshed analysis within 34 wetlands in Tampa, Florida, with a diverse array of geometries and vegetation structures. Based on this analysis, we computed optimal locations for 1 to 5 observers at each wetland. We also conducted a field validation at one of the larger, more accessible wetlands. The results demonstrate that incorporating LiDAR substantially reduced overestimation of visible area by about half in comparison to a surface-only analysis, though the amount depended on wetland shape, amount of open water, and tree canopy coverage. Optimal survey locations yielded a mean increase of about 6 times more visible area than the worst locations and about 1.5 times the average. The field validation found the LiDAR-based visibility analysis 90 % accurate. This framework provides practical tools to enhance wildlife survey design by explicitly accounting for visibility and observer placement, potentially improving data quality and optimizing field effort in ecological monitoring programs. • Surface terrain and LiDAR are used to estimate visibility for wildlife surveys. • LiDAR accounts for vegetation and structures that can block views, improving detectability estimates. • Integer programming is used to select observer locations that maximize the proportion of the study area that is visible. • Strategic placement of observers can substantially increase survey coverage compared to random survey locations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Informatics
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103478
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing point count survey locations with viewshed analysis and integer programming: A geospatial approach to wildlife detectability

Joni Downs
1 citations
Ecological Informatics
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
article

Optimizing point count survey locations with viewshed analysis and integer programming: A geospatial approach to wildlife detectability

Joni Downs
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Point counts are a common method for measuring wildlife abundance, but their accuracy can be limited by detectability biases influenced by observer location and environmental conditions. We present a geospatial approach integrating viewshed analysis with spatial optimization methods to optimize survey point placement and improve detectability estimates. We quantified visibility based upon both terrain-only and LiDAR enhanced viewshed analysis within 34 wetlands in Tampa, Florida, with a diverse array of geometries and vegetation structures. Based on this analysis, we computed optimal locations for 1 to 5 observers at each wetland. We also conducted a field validation at one of the larger, more accessible wetlands. The results demonstrate that incorporating LiDAR substantially reduced overestimation of visible area by about half in comparison to a surface-only analysis, though the amount depended on wetland shape, amount of open water, and tree canopy coverage. Optimal survey locations yielded a mean increase of about 6 times more visible area than the worst locations and about 1.5 times the average. The field validation found the LiDAR-based visibility analysis 90 % accurate. This framework provides practical tools to enhance wildlife survey design by explicitly accounting for visibility and observer placement, potentially improving data quality and optimizing field effort in ecological monitoring programs. • Surface terrain and LiDAR are used to estimate visibility for wildlife surveys. • LiDAR accounts for vegetation and structures that can block views, improving detectability estimates. • Integer programming is used to select observer locations that maximize the proportion of the study area that is visible. • Strategic placement of observers can substantially increase survey coverage compared to random survey locations.

Ecological InformaticsVol. 92
University of South Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimizing point count survey locations with viewshed analysis and integer programming: A geospatial approach to wildlife detectability — Joni Downs · Ecological Informatics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS