Social context affects observers' weighting of facial and verbal cues in estimating another’s pain

Observers estimate pain using multiple cues, such as verbal report or facial expression, and weighting them depending on social context. Evolutionary Social Contract Theory proposes that observers assess pain within a framework of cooperative exchanges where benefits such as care should be given only if pain is present, leading to a sensitivity to pain cues and adjustment of pain intensity estimates. Conflicting verbal and behavioral cues may affect observers' judgment difficulty, and observer characteristics may affect pain estimates. 106 participants were cued into different social contexts varying in the possibility of 'social cheating'. Next, participants were provided with verbal reports and facial expressions of women in pain based on which they had to estimate pain intensity and rate judgement difficulty. Last, participants had to judge the likeability of the women they had seen in the videos. When 'social cheating' was possible, more weight was given to facial cues and less weight to verbal cues when estimating pain. Conflicting verbal and facial pain cues were rated more difficult to judge. Women who had shown pain in their faces were perceived as less likeable. Neither observers' empathy nor their pain catastrophizing was associated with their pain estimates. The study highlights the effect of social context on pain estimates, and the dilemma associated with interpreting inconsistent verbal and facial cues of people in pain: verbal report is considered more easily manipulated and therefore taken less seriously, while the expression of facial pain elicits more negative judgements of the person with pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article shows that social context can shape how people judge others' pain. Results highlight that when 'social cheating' is possible, observers give more weight to facial expressions than to verbal reports. Awareness for these effects should be raised in health care professionals and support offered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pain
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105581
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social context affects observers' weighting of facial and verbal cues in estimating another’s pain

Amanda C de C Williams, Christiane Hermann, Judith Kappesser
Journal of Pain
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
article

Social context affects observers' weighting of facial and verbal cues in estimating another’s pain

Amanda C de C Williams, Christiane Hermann, Judith Kappesser
article en

Abstract

Observers estimate pain using multiple cues, such as verbal report or facial expression, and weighting them depending on social context. Evolutionary Social Contract Theory proposes that observers assess pain within a framework of cooperative exchanges where benefits such as care should be given only if pain is present, leading to a sensitivity to pain cues and adjustment of pain intensity estimates. Conflicting verbal and behavioral cues may affect observers' judgment difficulty, and observer characteristics may affect pain estimates. 106 participants were cued into different social contexts varying in the possibility of 'social cheating'. Next, participants were provided with verbal reports and facial expressions of women in pain based on which they had to estimate pain intensity and rate judgement difficulty. Last, participants had to judge the likeability of the women they had seen in the videos. When 'social cheating' was possible, more weight was given to facial cues and less weight to verbal cues when estimating pain. Conflicting verbal and facial pain cues were rated more difficult to judge. Women who had shown pain in their faces were perceived as less likeable. Neither observers' empathy nor their pain catastrophizing was associated with their pain estimates. The study highlights the effect of social context on pain estimates, and the dilemma associated with interpreting inconsistent verbal and facial cues of people in pain: verbal report is considered more easily manipulated and therefore taken less seriously, while the expression of facial pain elicits more negative judgements of the person with pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article shows that social context can shape how people judge others' pain. Results highlight that when 'social cheating' is possible, observers give more weight to facial expressions than to verbal reports. Awareness for these effects should be raised in health care professionals and support offered.

Journal of PainVol. 38
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.