Rendering unto Caesar: Receptions of the Bible as a source for secularism

In this article, I identify a key trend for demarcating the “secular” as a Western, Christian achievement. I analyze how the New Testament story often known as “Render unto Caesar” is referenced as a source for the secular West, particularly in writings by European and American conservative thinkers in the 1990s and early 2000s. My argument is that these references to “Render unto Caesar” constitute a reception of the Bible that reinforces what the classicist Clare Foster has described as recognition capital. The reference functions as an almost emptied signifier, relying on little to no knowledge of, or familiarity with, the Bible. Anyone who can claim Jesus’s words about rendering to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s as part of their tradition can celebrate their secular modern accomplishments, while anyone who cannot, are left outside as lacking a scriptural foundation for the secular.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Research on Religion
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20503032251381320
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rendering unto Caesar: Receptions of the Bible as a source for secularism

Hannah M Strømmen
Critical Research on Religion
Religion and Society Interactions
article

Rendering unto Caesar: Receptions of the Bible as a source for secularism

Hannah M Strømmen
article en

Abstract

In this article, I identify a key trend for demarcating the “secular” as a Western, Christian achievement. I analyze how the New Testament story often known as “Render unto Caesar” is referenced as a source for the secular West, particularly in writings by European and American conservative thinkers in the 1990s and early 2000s. My argument is that these references to “Render unto Caesar” constitute a reception of the Bible that reinforces what the classicist Clare Foster has described as recognition capital. The reference functions as an almost emptied signifier, relying on little to no knowledge of, or familiarity with, the Bible. Anyone who can claim Jesus’s words about rendering to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s as part of their tradition can celebrate their secular modern accomplishments, while anyone who cannot, are left outside as lacking a scriptural foundation for the secular.

Critical Research on ReligionVol. 13(3)
Lund University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.