Evaluation of the performance of the Smote, Smote Enn, and Borderline Smote resampling methods based on the number of outlier data with Z Score

Handling class imbalances in datasets is a significant challenge in the classification process. Disruption occurs if the minority class has a crucial role in decision-making. Oversampling is one of the solutions that is widely used to overcome this problem. This study compares the performance of three popular oversampling methods, namely SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique), SMOTE-ENN (SMOTE with Edited Nearest Neighbor), and Borderline-SMOTE, based on the number of outlier data produced. Outlier data is measured using a Z-score-based statistical approach. The research was conducted by applying the three oversampling methods on several datasets. Evaluation is carried out by counting the number of outlier data after the resample process, as well as by evaluating their impact on the performance of the classification model using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The research results show that there is no significant difference in the number of outlier data in SMOTE, ENN SMOTE, or borderline SMOTE. In the diabetes.csv dataset, it was found that the percentage of outlier data in the initial condition and the condition after resampling with SMOTE, resampling with SMOTE ENN, and borderline SMOTE were 7.4%, 6.8%, 6.7%, and 63%, respectively. For the predict_ honor.csv dataset, the data are 7.1%, 7.3%, 7.6%, and 7%. For the winequality.csv dataset, the data are 8%, 7.8%, 6.8%, and 5.8%. Meanwhile, smoking.csv data found 7.1%, 7.3%, 7.6%, and 7.0%. However, if we look at each feature in each dataset, more varied conditions are found regarding the performance of the three algorithms, which is related to the number of outlier data produced. In terms of differences, no significant differences were found in the number of outlier data produced. The second finding is related to the performance of the decision tree classification model. It can be stated that the influence of feature correlation is more important than perfect data balance in the dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lontar Komputer Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24843/lkjiti.2025.v16.i02.p05
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the performance of the Smote, Smote Enn, and Borderline Smote resampling methods based on the number of outlier data with Z Score

Nurfa Risha, Dewi Rahmawati, Arisgunadi Gunadi
1 citations
Lontar Komputer Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
article

Evaluation of the performance of the Smote, Smote Enn, and Borderline Smote resampling methods based on the number of outlier data with Z Score

Nurfa Risha, Dewi Rahmawati, Arisgunadi Gunadi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Handling class imbalances in datasets is a significant challenge in the classification process. Disruption occurs if the minority class has a crucial role in decision-making. Oversampling is one of the solutions that is widely used to overcome this problem. This study compares the performance of three popular oversampling methods, namely SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique), SMOTE-ENN (SMOTE with Edited Nearest Neighbor), and Borderline-SMOTE, based on the number of outlier data produced. Outlier data is measured using a Z-score-based statistical approach. The research was conducted by applying the three oversampling methods on several datasets. Evaluation is carried out by counting the number of outlier data after the resample process, as well as by evaluating their impact on the performance of the classification model using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The research results show that there is no significant difference in the number of outlier data in SMOTE, ENN SMOTE, or borderline SMOTE. In the diabetes.csv dataset, it was found that the percentage of outlier data in the initial condition and the condition after resampling with SMOTE, resampling with SMOTE ENN, and borderline SMOTE were 7.4%, 6.8%, 6.7%, and 63%, respectively. For the predict_ honor.csv dataset, the data are 7.1%, 7.3%, 7.6%, and 7%. For the winequality.csv dataset, the data are 8%, 7.8%, 6.8%, and 5.8%. Meanwhile, smoking.csv data found 7.1%, 7.3%, 7.6%, and 7.0%. However, if we look at each feature in each dataset, more varied conditions are found regarding the performance of the three algorithms, which is related to the number of outlier data produced. In terms of differences, no significant differences were found in the number of outlier data produced. The second finding is related to the performance of the decision tree classification model. It can be stated that the influence of feature correlation is more important than perfect data balance in the dataset.

Lontar Komputer Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi InformasiVol. 16(2)
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.