From Ministries of Food to National Food System Committees: A Global Mapping and Typology of Multisectoral Food System Governance Institutions

ABSTRACT Transforming the ways food systems are governed is key to achieving better social, environmental, and economic outcomes, all crucial to sustainable development. Strong multisectoral governance is critical to achieving this, but there is little evidence on the structure and function of governance mechanisms in this context. We undertook a policy review of 197 countries globally to map existing multisectoral food system governance institutions, develop a typology based on their characteristics, and identify their building blocks. We identified 34 countries with a relevant institution: four established a ministry (or unit), and 30 had a formal structure for coordination (‘governance mechanism’) in place. Ten such mechanisms only included government agencies, while 20 had a participatory approach and included non‐state actors. We identified nine building blocks that define the functions that the institutions are designed to fulfil, from tasks across agenda setting, policy making, decision making, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. The diverse institutions uncovered indicate that there is no single ‘one‐size‐fits‐all’ solution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70320
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Ministries of Food to National Food System Committees: A Global Mapping and Typology of Multisectoral Food System Governance Institutions

Anne Marie Thow, Dori Patay, Holly Rippin, Belinda Reeve et al.
1 citations
Sustainable Development
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
4.83
article

From Ministries of Food to National Food System Committees: A Global Mapping and Typology of Multisectoral Food System Governance Institutions

Anne Marie Thow, Dori Patay, Holly Rippin, Belinda Reeve, Carolina Venegas Hargous, Erica Reeve, Penny Farrell, Gastón Ares
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Transforming the ways food systems are governed is key to achieving better social, environmental, and economic outcomes, all crucial to sustainable development. Strong multisectoral governance is critical to achieving this, but there is little evidence on the structure and function of governance mechanisms in this context. We undertook a policy review of 197 countries globally to map existing multisectoral food system governance institutions, develop a typology based on their characteristics, and identify their building blocks. We identified 34 countries with a relevant institution: four established a ministry (or unit), and 30 had a formal structure for coordination (‘governance mechanism’) in place. Ten such mechanisms only included government agencies, while 20 had a participatory approach and included non‐state actors. We identified nine building blocks that define the functions that the institutions are designed to fulfil, from tasks across agenda setting, policy making, decision making, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. The diverse institutions uncovered indicate that there is no single ‘one‐size‐fits‐all’ solution.

Sustainable DevelopmentVol. 34(1)
The University of Sydney (AU), Deakin University (AU), Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY), UNSW Sydney (AU), World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (DK), WWF Cameroon (CM)
Australian Government, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
4.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.