The power of the purse: gender, cooperation, and socially responsible consumption

We test for gender effects in the “vote with your wallet” game, a multi- person version of the prisoner's dilemma that models responsible consump- tion decisions. We find that women cooperate significantly more (have more responsible consumption decisions) than men in the baseline version of the game. This baseline excludes three additional elements tested in companion treatments: i) a legality frame, where the ethical product is labeled as being certified for compliance with anticorruption standards; ii) an ex-post redistribution scheme, where those who buy the less ethical product compensate those who choose the more responsible option; and iii) a conformity treatment, where participants are informed of prior players' choices to simulate social influence. Without these added interventions, women still show significantly greater cooperation, revealing a baseline preference for prosocial behavior in this strategic consumption setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Behavioral Economics
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frbhe.2025.1612211
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The power of the purse: gender, cooperation, and socially responsible consumption

Vittorio Pelligra, Alejandra Vásquez, Leonardo Becchetti
1 citations
Frontiers in Behavioral Economics
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
2.37
article

The power of the purse: gender, cooperation, and socially responsible consumption

Vittorio Pelligra, Alejandra Vásquez, Leonardo Becchetti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We test for gender effects in the “vote with your wallet” game, a multi- person version of the prisoner's dilemma that models responsible consump- tion decisions. We find that women cooperate significantly more (have more responsible consumption decisions) than men in the baseline version of the game. This baseline excludes three additional elements tested in companion treatments: i) a legality frame, where the ethical product is labeled as being certified for compliance with anticorruption standards; ii) an ex-post redistribution scheme, where those who buy the less ethical product compensate those who choose the more responsible option; and iii) a conformity treatment, where participants are informed of prior players' choices to simulate social influence. Without these added interventions, women still show significantly greater cooperation, revealing a baseline preference for prosocial behavior in this strategic consumption setting.

Frontiers in Behavioral EconomicsVol. 4
Universidad de Santiago de Chile (CL), University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of Cagliari (IT), University of Chile (CL)
Università degli Studi di Cagliari
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.