EXPANDING ENVELOP OF DISCREPANCY

Time is a crucial factor in Orthodontics which presents us with 2 pertinent questions, timing of treatment and time taken for treatment. While the duration of Orthodontic treatment is of concern to both the patient as well as the orthodontist, treatment timing is of paramount importance to the orthodontist as the success of orthodontic therapy, especially in individuals who present to us during the growth period, is dictated by appropriate treatment timing.The one phase vs two phase debate is an evergreen one among orthodontists with several generations of orthodontists recommending early treatment ever since functional jaw orthopedics saw the light of day. However, the paradigm shifted in the late 90s after revered orthodontists such as Tulloch and Proffit et al1, Keeling and Wheeler2 et al, Gianelly3 at al., with their prospective clinical trials presented robust data that the results of early orthodontic treatment although positive,do not stay on. They arrived at a conclusion that the inherent growth pattern and genetic potential of the patients causes the residual growth to nullify the treatment effects of phase 1 therapy, by the time comprehensive phase 2 orthodontic treatment is completed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Research
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/21808
Primary Topic
Quality of Life Measurement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXPANDING ENVELOP OF DISCREPANCY

Navya Puvvula, Katam Monica, ViziaMuddada ViziaMuddada, B L PrsannaThathapudi et al.
International Journal of Advanced Research
Quality of Life Measurement
article

EXPANDING ENVELOP OF DISCREPANCY

Navya Puvvula, Katam Monica, ViziaMuddada ViziaMuddada, B L PrsannaThathapudi, Gali Udayadityeswari, Limasunep Jamir
article en

Abstract

Time is a crucial factor in Orthodontics which presents us with 2 pertinent questions, timing of treatment and time taken for treatment. While the duration of Orthodontic treatment is of concern to both the patient as well as the orthodontist, treatment timing is of paramount importance to the orthodontist as the success of orthodontic therapy, especially in individuals who present to us during the growth period, is dictated by appropriate treatment timing.The one phase vs two phase debate is an evergreen one among orthodontists with several generations of orthodontists recommending early treatment ever since functional jaw orthopedics saw the light of day. However, the paradigm shifted in the late 90s after revered orthodontists such as Tulloch and Proffit et al1, Keeling and Wheeler2 et al, Gianelly3 at al., with their prospective clinical trials presented robust data that the results of early orthodontic treatment although positive,do not stay on. They arrived at a conclusion that the inherent growth pattern and genetic potential of the patients causes the residual growth to nullify the treatment effects of phase 1 therapy, by the time comprehensive phase 2 orthodontic treatment is completed.

International Journal of Advanced ResearchVol. 13(09)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Quality of Life Measurement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.