“Propaganda State 2.0” in China

Abstract By observing China’s domestic media landscape and state policies during the COVID-19 pandemic, this paper proposes the concept of “propaganda state 2.0” as a framework for exploring autocratic state propaganda from a holistic perspective. It contends that state propaganda in China remains an agitprop apparatus deeply embedded in the totality of the authoritarian regime, which it both serves and is served by. This system performs both conventional persuasion and indoctrination functions, as well as fulfilling the now underestimated mission of agitation, which can enhance the credibility of propaganda messages. This framework emphasizes the legacies of China’s past “propaganda state” and effectively explains how the party-state transformed the pandemic into opportunities to win popular support, and how this resulted in a debacle. Theoretically, the article highlights how state propaganda in contemporary China can shape, if not dictate, state policy, while serving as a more organic framework that bridges the “hard” and “soft” propaganda literatures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The China Quarterly
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305741025101574
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Propaganda State 2.0” in China

Rongbin Han
The China Quarterly
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
article

“Propaganda State 2.0” in China

Rongbin Han
article en

Abstract

Abstract By observing China’s domestic media landscape and state policies during the COVID-19 pandemic, this paper proposes the concept of “propaganda state 2.0” as a framework for exploring autocratic state propaganda from a holistic perspective. It contends that state propaganda in China remains an agitprop apparatus deeply embedded in the totality of the authoritarian regime, which it both serves and is served by. This system performs both conventional persuasion and indoctrination functions, as well as fulfilling the now underestimated mission of agitation, which can enhance the credibility of propaganda messages. This framework emphasizes the legacies of China’s past “propaganda state” and effectively explains how the party-state transformed the pandemic into opportunities to win popular support, and how this resulted in a debacle. Theoretically, the article highlights how state propaganda in contemporary China can shape, if not dictate, state policy, while serving as a more organic framework that bridges the “hard” and “soft” propaganda literatures.

The China QuarterlyVol. 264
University of Georgia (US), Office of International Affairs (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.