Palliative Radiotherapy for Dysphagia in Esophageal Cancer: Short-Term Benefits and Late Toxicity Risks

Introduction Esophageal cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, with dysphagia being the most common and distressing symptom that significantly impairs quality of life (QOL). Palliative radiotherapy is frequently used to relieve dysphagia, but its benefits and risks remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate short-term dysphagia improvement and treatment-related toxicities in patients with esophageal cancer receiving palliative radiotherapy. Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed 58 patients with esophageal cancer and dysphagia treated with palliative radiotherapy (30-40 Gy in 10-20 fractions) between April 2016 and March 2024. Of these, four patients (7%) received radiotherapy alone, while the remaining 54 (93%) underwent concurrent chemotherapy. Dysphagia scores were assessed before radiotherapy and one month after. Overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicities were also evaluated. Results Following radiotherapy, 45 of 58 patients (78%) experienced improvement in dysphagia, with a median time to symptom relief of 35 days. Among these 45 patients, recurrent dysphagia occurred in 17 (38%), with a median time from improvement to recurrence of 4.3 months (interquartile range (IQR), 2.2 to 6.0 months) and a median survival of 1.2 months after recurrence (IQR, 0.6 to 2.0 months). Across all patients, those who received concurrent chemotherapy tended to have higher rates of dysphagia improvement, suggesting that combination treatment may further alleviate esophageal obstruction. In patients with T3 disease or earlier, palliative radiotherapy was generally safe, and symptom relief contributed to improved oral intake and potential QOL benefits. In contrast, patients with T4b disease had a high incidence of late grade 2 to 3 esophageal or bronchial fistulas (36%), significantly more frequent than in T3 cases (6.7%). Acute toxicities were generally mild, but the risk of serious late adverse events in advanced disease highlights the need for careful patient selection. Conclusion Palliative radiotherapy can improve short-term dysphagia in most patients with esophageal cancer; however, patients with T4b disease face a higher risk of serious late adverse events, necessitating careful selection. While symptom relief may temporarily improve QOL, clinicians should weigh these risks carefully and discuss them with patients before proceeding. Patients should be counseled not only about the potential for short-term symptom relief but also about the risks of dysphagia recurrence and serious late adverse events to support shared decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.94605
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Palliative Radiotherapy for Dysphagia in Esophageal Cancer: Short-Term Benefits and Late Toxicity Risks

Tetsuya Abe, Masahiro Tajika, Takahiro Aoyama, Shigenori Kadowaki et al.
Cureus
Esophageal and GI Pathology
article

Palliative Radiotherapy for Dysphagia in Esophageal Cancer: Short-Term Benefits and Late Toxicity Risks

Tetsuya Abe, Masahiro Tajika, Takahiro Aoyama, Shigenori Kadowaki, Takeshi Kodaira, Yutaro Koide, Shingo Hashimoto, Hiroyuki Tachibana, Yurika Shindo, Masamune Noguchi
article en

Abstract

Introduction Esophageal cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, with dysphagia being the most common and distressing symptom that significantly impairs quality of life (QOL). Palliative radiotherapy is frequently used to relieve dysphagia, but its benefits and risks remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate short-term dysphagia improvement and treatment-related toxicities in patients with esophageal cancer receiving palliative radiotherapy. Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed 58 patients with esophageal cancer and dysphagia treated with palliative radiotherapy (30-40 Gy in 10-20 fractions) between April 2016 and March 2024. Of these, four patients (7%) received radiotherapy alone, while the remaining 54 (93%) underwent concurrent chemotherapy. Dysphagia scores were assessed before radiotherapy and one month after. Overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicities were also evaluated. Results Following radiotherapy, 45 of 58 patients (78%) experienced improvement in dysphagia, with a median time to symptom relief of 35 days. Among these 45 patients, recurrent dysphagia occurred in 17 (38%), with a median time from improvement to recurrence of 4.3 months (interquartile range (IQR), 2.2 to 6.0 months) and a median survival of 1.2 months after recurrence (IQR, 0.6 to 2.0 months). Across all patients, those who received concurrent chemotherapy tended to have higher rates of dysphagia improvement, suggesting that combination treatment may further alleviate esophageal obstruction. In patients with T3 disease or earlier, palliative radiotherapy was generally safe, and symptom relief contributed to improved oral intake and potential QOL benefits. In contrast, patients with T4b disease had a high incidence of late grade 2 to 3 esophageal or bronchial fistulas (36%), significantly more frequent than in T3 cases (6.7%). Acute toxicities were generally mild, but the risk of serious late adverse events in advanced disease highlights the need for careful patient selection. Conclusion Palliative radiotherapy can improve short-term dysphagia in most patients with esophageal cancer; however, patients with T4b disease face a higher risk of serious late adverse events, necessitating careful selection. While symptom relief may temporarily improve QOL, clinicians should weigh these risks carefully and discuss them with patients before proceeding. Patients should be counseled not only about the potential for short-term symptom relief but also about the risks of dysphagia recurrence and serious late adverse events to support shared decision-making.

CureusVol. 17(10)
Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hospital (JP), Aichi Cancer Center (JP)
Fujita Health University
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.