Disrupting deficit mindsets: mitigating cognition that derails equitable continuous improvement

Introduction Continuous improvement (CI) has transformative potential but far too often that potential is unrealized. Practitioners engaging in CI are frequently guided by mindsets that derail system transformation by shifting the focus from improving systems to fixing people. Methods Employing multiple data sources (document analysis of dissertations in practice and interviews) this multi-case study examines nine cases of scholar-practitioners engaging in CI work and how they mitigated the impact of deficit mindsets. Results Cross-case analysis revealed four strategies for disrupting deficit ideology in CI work: composing intentional teams, building team capacity, employing critical theory, and involving those impacted. Discussion Implications for engaging in CI and teaching CI are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1581703
Primary Topic
Mind wandering and attention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disrupting deficit mindsets: mitigating cognition that derails equitable continuous improvement

Ruth A. Childs, Brandi Hinnant-Crawford, Augustine Owusu Achiaw
Frontiers in Education
Mind wandering and attention
article

Disrupting deficit mindsets: mitigating cognition that derails equitable continuous improvement

Ruth A. Childs, Brandi Hinnant-Crawford, Augustine Owusu Achiaw
article en

Abstract

Introduction Continuous improvement (CI) has transformative potential but far too often that potential is unrealized. Practitioners engaging in CI are frequently guided by mindsets that derail system transformation by shifting the focus from improving systems to fixing people. Methods Employing multiple data sources (document analysis of dissertations in practice and interviews) this multi-case study examines nine cases of scholar-practitioners engaging in CI work and how they mitigated the impact of deficit mindsets. Results Cross-case analysis revealed four strategies for disrupting deficit ideology in CI work: composing intentional teams, building team capacity, employing critical theory, and involving those impacted. Discussion Implications for engaging in CI and teaching CI are discussed.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
Rowan-Cabarrus Community College (US), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Mind wandering and attention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.