Football training vs. martial arts training: How are they related to executive function skills in 5–6-year-old boys?

Sports training is one of the most popular extracurricular activities among preschool and elementary school children. The aim of this pilot study was to compare executive function skills in preschool boys who participated in football training and those who undertook martial arts training. The participants were sixty (60) typically developing 5-6-year-old boys from large Russian cities. There were two groups with 30 boys in each group: a football group and a martial arts group. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) male gender; (b) boys did not attend any extracurricular activities other than their football training or martial arts training; (c) the duration of football or martial arts training session was more than 30 min; (d) boys attended these trainings for at least 6 months and no more than 2 years. Caregivers reported on the specifics of child's attendance at sports training and child's age, maternal education, and family income, which were used as control variables. The results indicated that boys involved in football training had significantly higher spatial component of visuospatial working memory compared to boys involved in martial arts training. Taken together, these findings suggest that football training compared to martial arts training in 5-6-year-old boys may have more potential in terms of developing spatial component of visuospatial working memory. The results of this pilot study could serve as a basis for further investigation on this topic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1668266
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Training Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Football training vs. martial arts training: How are they related to executive function skills in 5–6-year-old boys?

Anastasia Yakushina, A. V. Pashenko, М. Г. Дмитриева, Natalia A. Rudnova et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Psychology
Physical Education and Training Studies
9.52
article

Football training vs. martial arts training: How are they related to executive function skills in 5–6-year-old boys?

Anastasia Yakushina, A. V. Pashenko, М. Г. Дмитриева, Natalia A. Rudnova, Elena Chichinina
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Sports training is one of the most popular extracurricular activities among preschool and elementary school children. The aim of this pilot study was to compare executive function skills in preschool boys who participated in football training and those who undertook martial arts training. The participants were sixty (60) typically developing 5-6-year-old boys from large Russian cities. There were two groups with 30 boys in each group: a football group and a martial arts group. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) male gender; (b) boys did not attend any extracurricular activities other than their football training or martial arts training; (c) the duration of football or martial arts training session was more than 30 min; (d) boys attended these trainings for at least 6 months and no more than 2 years. Caregivers reported on the specifics of child's attendance at sports training and child's age, maternal education, and family income, which were used as control variables. The results indicated that boys involved in football training had significantly higher spatial component of visuospatial working memory compared to boys involved in martial arts training. Taken together, these findings suggest that football training compared to martial arts training in 5-6-year-old boys may have more potential in terms of developing spatial component of visuospatial working memory. The results of this pilot study could serve as a basis for further investigation on this topic.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Academician Pilyugin Center (RU)
Russian Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Physical Education and Training Studies
9.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.