Institutional resilience and crisis governance in the EU: insights from the Lisbon Metropolitan Experience

This article explores the role of metropolitan institutions in crisis governance, drawing on the case of the Lisbon Metropolitan Area (LMA) during the COVID-19 pandemic. While formal decision-making in Portugal remained centralized, local institutions were critical in implementing emergency responses, sustaining services, and supporting vulnerable populations. Based on survey data from 90 public and associative entities, the analysis reveals high levels of institutional adaptability and lateral cooperation, despite the absence of coordinated metropolitan governance. However, responses were primarily adaptive rather than transformational, and structural challenges, including digital inequality, fragmented coordination, and lack of institutional learning, persisted. The findings highlight the need to integrate metropolitan actors more fully into EU crisis governance frameworks, not merely as implementers but as co-designers of inclusive and resilient responses. The Lisbon experience underscores both the potential and limitations of emergent, bottom-up resilience and calls for the institutionalization of metropolitan governance as a key dimension of future EU crisis preparedness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Political Science
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1700468
Primary Topic
Regional resilience and development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional resilience and crisis governance in the EU: insights from the Lisbon Metropolitan Experience

Larysa Lebedeva, Jorge Gonçalves, Sílvia Spolaor
Frontiers in Political Science
Regional resilience and development
article

Institutional resilience and crisis governance in the EU: insights from the Lisbon Metropolitan Experience

Larysa Lebedeva, Jorge Gonçalves, Sílvia Spolaor
article en

Abstract

This article explores the role of metropolitan institutions in crisis governance, drawing on the case of the Lisbon Metropolitan Area (LMA) during the COVID-19 pandemic. While formal decision-making in Portugal remained centralized, local institutions were critical in implementing emergency responses, sustaining services, and supporting vulnerable populations. Based on survey data from 90 public and associative entities, the analysis reveals high levels of institutional adaptability and lateral cooperation, despite the absence of coordinated metropolitan governance. However, responses were primarily adaptive rather than transformational, and structural challenges, including digital inequality, fragmented coordination, and lack of institutional learning, persisted. The findings highlight the need to integrate metropolitan actors more fully into EU crisis governance frameworks, not merely as implementers but as co-designers of inclusive and resilient responses. The Lisbon experience underscores both the potential and limitations of emergent, bottom-up resilience and calls for the institutionalization of metropolitan governance as a key dimension of future EU crisis preparedness.

Frontiers in Political ScienceVol. 7
University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade do Porto (PT), State University of Trade and Economics (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Regional resilience and development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.