Sex and Limb Dominance Differences in Postural Control Performance of Young Adults: A Third-Order Polynomial Decay Approach

This study systematically evaluated postural control performance on dominant and non-dominant sides in young adults of different sexes using a Third-Order Polynomial Decay fitting method combined with time-domain stability features. A total of 126 participants (66 males, 60 females) performed single-leg landing tasks, during which ground reaction forces (GRF) and center of pressure (COP) data were collected using a Kistler 3D force platform and Bioware acquisition system. Dynamic stability times in the anterior–posterior, medial–lateral, and vertical directions were calculated with polynomial fitting, and additional time-domain measures were used to assess static and dynamic stability. Results showed that on the non-dominant side, participants exhibited significantly longer dynamic stability times (p = 0.015), greater root mean square distance (p = 0.005), and longer total sway path (p = 0.005) in the anterior–posterior direction compared with the dominant side. Significant sex differences were also found in vertical stability index (p = 0.044), dynamic stability index (p = 0.047), total sway path (p < 0.001), anterior–posterior sway path (p = 0.001), and medial–lateral sway path (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the dominant limb demonstrated superior stability, males showed better static control, and females displayed greater dynamic stability, underscoring the importance of targeted non-dominant training and sex-specific balance strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17101734
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex and Limb Dominance Differences in Postural Control Performance of Young Adults: A Third-Order Polynomial Decay Approach

Jiujiang Liu, Xingchen Zhang, Yuan Gao, Hongxun Wu et al.
Symmetry
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Sex and Limb Dominance Differences in Postural Control Performance of Young Adults: A Third-Order Polynomial Decay Approach

Jiujiang Liu, Xingchen Zhang, Yuan Gao, Hongxun Wu, Guanying Wang, Yang Sun, Lian Duan
article en

Abstract

This study systematically evaluated postural control performance on dominant and non-dominant sides in young adults of different sexes using a Third-Order Polynomial Decay fitting method combined with time-domain stability features. A total of 126 participants (66 males, 60 females) performed single-leg landing tasks, during which ground reaction forces (GRF) and center of pressure (COP) data were collected using a Kistler 3D force platform and Bioware acquisition system. Dynamic stability times in the anterior–posterior, medial–lateral, and vertical directions were calculated with polynomial fitting, and additional time-domain measures were used to assess static and dynamic stability. Results showed that on the non-dominant side, participants exhibited significantly longer dynamic stability times (p = 0.015), greater root mean square distance (p = 0.005), and longer total sway path (p = 0.005) in the anterior–posterior direction compared with the dominant side. Significant sex differences were also found in vertical stability index (p = 0.044), dynamic stability index (p = 0.047), total sway path (p < 0.001), anterior–posterior sway path (p = 0.001), and medial–lateral sway path (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the dominant limb demonstrated superior stability, males showed better static control, and females displayed greater dynamic stability, underscoring the importance of targeted non-dominant training and sex-specific balance strategies.

SymmetryVol. 17(10)
Yanshan University (CN), Beijing Sport University (CN)
Yanshan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.