Engaging Educators in the Codesign, Feasibility, and Implementation Quality of Early Years Interventions: The <scp>ONE</scp> Program

ABSTRACT Giving practitioners a voice is essential in developing intervention programs that are adapted to educator and child needs. We aimed to do so by involving educators in the codesign of an intervention supporting early mathematical and executive development, to maximize feasibility and implementation quality. N = 100 educators, N = 24 Early Years Centers (EYCs), and N = 16 education science experts took part. Educators expressed a need for feasible professional development coupled with practical activity suggestions (Phase I). A scientist/educator expert panel developed the intervention (Phase II), further refined via educator input (Phase III) to overcome implementation barriers (e.g., diverse children's needs). In Phase IV, mixed methods revealed successful solutions (e.g., differentiation guidance) and additional barriers (e.g., diverse staff demands). We demonstrate the value of an iterative codesign process for complex educator‐led interventions to produce programs addressing specific needs of educators and children whilst retaining key theoretical principles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mind Brain and Education
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.70028
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engaging Educators in the Codesign, Feasibility, and Implementation Quality of Early Years Interventions: The ONE Program

Sylvia Gattas, Megan von Spreckelsen, Victoria Simms, Emma Blakey et al.
Mind Brain and Education
Early Childhood Education and Development
article

Engaging Educators in the Codesign, Feasibility, and Implementation Quality of Early Years Interventions: The ONE Program

Sylvia Gattas, Megan von Spreckelsen, Victoria Simms, Emma Blakey, Steven James Howard, Gaia Scerif, Rosie O'Connor, Carmel Brough, Toni Loveridge, Κathy Sylva, Zachary Hawes, Caroline Korell, Keely Cook, Rebecca Merkley, Fionnuala O’Reilly
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Giving practitioners a voice is essential in developing intervention programs that are adapted to educator and child needs. We aimed to do so by involving educators in the codesign of an intervention supporting early mathematical and executive development, to maximize feasibility and implementation quality. N = 100 educators, N = 24 Early Years Centers (EYCs), and N = 16 education science experts took part. Educators expressed a need for feasible professional development coupled with practical activity suggestions (Phase I). A scientist/educator expert panel developed the intervention (Phase II), further refined via educator input (Phase III) to overcome implementation barriers (e.g., diverse children's needs). In Phase IV, mixed methods revealed successful solutions (e.g., differentiation guidance) and additional barriers (e.g., diverse staff demands). We demonstrate the value of an iterative codesign process for complex educator‐led interventions to produce programs addressing specific needs of educators and children whilst retaining key theoretical principles.

Mind Brain and EducationVol. 19(4)
Employment and Social Development Canada (CA), University of Ulster (GB), University of Toronto (CA), University of Wollongong (AU), Lancashire County Council (GB), Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania (AU), University of Oxford (GB), Carleton University (CA), University of Sheffield (GB)
Nuffield Foundation, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Early Childhood Education and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.