CO2 Estimation of Tree Biomass in Forest Stands: A Simple and IPCC-Compliant Approach

Background: While forests are pivotal for climate change mitigation, robust CO2 accounting is required to quantify their climate benefits. However, varying current methodologies complicate this process for practitioners. This study addresses the need for a low-threshold, IPCC-compliant CO2 estimation method of tree biomass in forest stands. Methods: We developed CO2 yield tables by integrating segmented allometric biomass functions into fourth-generation yield tables, combining empirical data and simulations for Northwest Germany. Above- and belowground biomass was calculated, converted into CO2, and compared with estimates from traditional expansion factors. An interactive R Shiny dashboard was designed to visualise results. Results: The main results of this article are the carbon yield tables, covering beech (Fagus sylvatica), oak (Quercus spp.), spruce (Picea abies), pine (Pinus sylvestris) and Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), each across various yield classes and starting at age 1, thereby also encompassing the juvenile phase of forest stands. Our comparison with estimates from traditional expansion factors shows that the latter can substantially overestimate carbon content in forest stands compared to our results, ranging from 20% to 35%, with higher estimates for mature stands and improved representation of early growth. The interactive dashboard also allows readers to experiment with their own figures. Conclusions: The choice of CO2 methodology profoundly affects results. Our yield tables and a calculation tool (dashboard) deliver a transparent, accessible tool for quantifying forest CO2 stock, supporting sustainable management and carbon market participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f16101580
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CO2 Estimation of Tree Biomass in Forest Stands: A Simple and IPCC-Compliant Approach

Peter Elsasser, Björn Seintsch, Marlen Brinkord
Forests
Forest ecology and management
article

CO2 Estimation of Tree Biomass in Forest Stands: A Simple and IPCC-Compliant Approach

Peter Elsasser, Björn Seintsch, Marlen Brinkord
article en

Abstract

Background: While forests are pivotal for climate change mitigation, robust CO2 accounting is required to quantify their climate benefits. However, varying current methodologies complicate this process for practitioners. This study addresses the need for a low-threshold, IPCC-compliant CO2 estimation method of tree biomass in forest stands. Methods: We developed CO2 yield tables by integrating segmented allometric biomass functions into fourth-generation yield tables, combining empirical data and simulations for Northwest Germany. Above- and belowground biomass was calculated, converted into CO2, and compared with estimates from traditional expansion factors. An interactive R Shiny dashboard was designed to visualise results. Results: The main results of this article are the carbon yield tables, covering beech (Fagus sylvatica), oak (Quercus spp.), spruce (Picea abies), pine (Pinus sylvestris) and Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), each across various yield classes and starting at age 1, thereby also encompassing the juvenile phase of forest stands. Our comparison with estimates from traditional expansion factors shows that the latter can substantially overestimate carbon content in forest stands compared to our results, ranging from 20% to 35%, with higher estimates for mature stands and improved representation of early growth. The interactive dashboard also allows readers to experiment with their own figures. Conclusions: The choice of CO2 methodology profoundly affects results. Our yield tables and a calculation tool (dashboard) deliver a transparent, accessible tool for quantifying forest CO2 stock, supporting sustainable management and carbon market participation.

ForestsVol. 16(10)
Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE), Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt (DE)
Australian Government, Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Forest ecology and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.