Problems of assessing the clinical efficiency of artificial intelligence systemsin diagnosing ischemic stroke

Artificial intelligence (AI) is actively used in the diagnosis of ischemic stroke, allowing speeding up the decision-making process and improving the accuracy of diagnosis. Machine learning models are able to identify ischemic areas based on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging data, as well as indicate the volume of damage and calculate the ASPECTS score. Modern AI systems demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy, comparable to the accuracy of radiologists. According to clinical studies, these systems significantly reduce the time from the patient admission to the vascular center to treatment, but their impact on clinical outcomes remains unclear. The review discusses the problems of assessing the clinical effectiveness of AI in the diagnosis of ischemic stroke, including systematic bias in model training and choice of study design, as well as publication bias. To integrate AI into clinical practice, randomized controlled trials with clinically relevant endpoints, as well as standardization of data and methods for assessing effectiveness, are needed. Despite significant AI advances in diagnosing ischemic stroke, their effectiveness in real-world practice requires further study and validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Cardiology
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2025-6357
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Problems of assessing the clinical efficiency of artificial intelligence systemsin diagnosing ischemic stroke

Ilya O. Balunov
Russian Journal of Cardiology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Problems of assessing the clinical efficiency of artificial intelligence systemsin diagnosing ischemic stroke

Ilya O. Balunov
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is actively used in the diagnosis of ischemic stroke, allowing speeding up the decision-making process and improving the accuracy of diagnosis. Machine learning models are able to identify ischemic areas based on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging data, as well as indicate the volume of damage and calculate the ASPECTS score. Modern AI systems demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy, comparable to the accuracy of radiologists. According to clinical studies, these systems significantly reduce the time from the patient admission to the vascular center to treatment, but their impact on clinical outcomes remains unclear. The review discusses the problems of assessing the clinical effectiveness of AI in the diagnosis of ischemic stroke, including systematic bias in model training and choice of study design, as well as publication bias. To integrate AI into clinical practice, randomized controlled trials with clinically relevant endpoints, as well as standardization of data and methods for assessing effectiveness, are needed. Despite significant AI advances in diagnosing ischemic stroke, their effectiveness in real-world practice requires further study and validation.

Russian Journal of CardiologyVol. 30(9S)
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Problems of assessing the clinical efficiency of artificial intelligence systemsin diagnosing ischemic stroke — Ilya O. Balunov · Russian Journal of Cardiology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS