Bridging gaps in rural resilience: smallholder farmers' perceptions of formal and community-based social assistance in Indonesia

Abstract Smallholder farmers play a crucial role in Indonesia’s agricultural sector, contributing significantly to food security and rural livelihoods. However, their vulnerability to economic, social, and environmental risks necessitates external support, particularly through social assistance programs. While formal government assistance programs provide structured financial aid, community-based assistance mechanisms offer localized and culturally embedded support. The effectiveness of these programs is heavily influenced by smallholders' perceptions and acceptance. This study aims to explore smallholder farmers' perceptions of formal social assistance and community-based aid in Indonesia. It investigates the factors shaping these perceptions and their implications for policy and program development. The study was conducted in three representative provinces: West Sumatra, West Java, and South Sulawesi. Data were collected from 92 smallholder farmers through structured surveys assessing their knowledge, attitudes, and opinions on both forms of social assistance. Perception analysis was performed using a Likert scale to categorize responses. The findings indicate that smallholder farmers in the study area generally hold positive perceptions of both formal and community-based social assistance. Government social assistance is appreciated for its structured distribution and reliability, while community-based assistance is valued for its flexibility, social cohesion, and responsiveness to local needs. However, concerns regarding adequacy and fairness persist, particularly in government-led programs. Integrating formal and community-based assistance mechanisms could enhance social support effectiveness for smallholder farmers. To move beyond short-term relief, policies should consider establishing integrated community centers at the village level that link social assistance with agricultural extension, financial services, and cooperative initiatives. In addition, adopting a transformative approach that prioritizes women, youth, and smallholder farmers through participatory targeting and accountability mechanisms would strengthen inclusive and sustainable rural resilience in Indonesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural and Food Economics
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-025-00415-0
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging gaps in rural resilience: smallholder farmers' perceptions of formal and community-based social assistance in Indonesia

Wahyudi Isnan, Andayani Listyawati, Aminudin Aminudin, Iriani Iriani et al.
Agricultural and Food Economics
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

Bridging gaps in rural resilience: smallholder farmers' perceptions of formal and community-based social assistance in Indonesia

Wahyudi Isnan, Andayani Listyawati, Aminudin Aminudin, Iriani Iriani, Dian Diniyati, Nurhaedah Muin, Muhammad Alie Humaedi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Smallholder farmers play a crucial role in Indonesia’s agricultural sector, contributing significantly to food security and rural livelihoods. However, their vulnerability to economic, social, and environmental risks necessitates external support, particularly through social assistance programs. While formal government assistance programs provide structured financial aid, community-based assistance mechanisms offer localized and culturally embedded support. The effectiveness of these programs is heavily influenced by smallholders' perceptions and acceptance. This study aims to explore smallholder farmers' perceptions of formal social assistance and community-based aid in Indonesia. It investigates the factors shaping these perceptions and their implications for policy and program development. The study was conducted in three representative provinces: West Sumatra, West Java, and South Sulawesi. Data were collected from 92 smallholder farmers through structured surveys assessing their knowledge, attitudes, and opinions on both forms of social assistance. Perception analysis was performed using a Likert scale to categorize responses. The findings indicate that smallholder farmers in the study area generally hold positive perceptions of both formal and community-based social assistance. Government social assistance is appreciated for its structured distribution and reliability, while community-based assistance is valued for its flexibility, social cohesion, and responsiveness to local needs. However, concerns regarding adequacy and fairness persist, particularly in government-led programs. Integrating formal and community-based assistance mechanisms could enhance social support effectiveness for smallholder farmers. To move beyond short-term relief, policies should consider establishing integrated community centers at the village level that link social assistance with agricultural extension, financial services, and cooperative initiatives. In addition, adopting a transformative approach that prioritizes women, youth, and smallholder farmers through participatory targeting and accountability mechanisms would strengthen inclusive and sustainable rural resilience in Indonesia.

Agricultural and Food EconomicsVol. 13(1)
IPB University (ID), National Research, Development and Innovation Office (HU), National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia (ID)
Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.