An Assessment of Tanzania’s Legal Framework on Military Field Training and Environmental Protection in Comparison with China

This paper assesses Tanzania’s environmental legislation on military field training in comparison with China. Both countries have ratified environmental treaties and conduct regular land, air and water training that impacts ecosystems, yet Tanzania’s military role in environmental decline has received little scrutiny. Using doctrinal and qualitative research, the study compares relevant regulations in both jurisdictions, drawing lessons from China’s more developed framework. China integrates environmental norms into both military and environmental law ensuring coordination and specificity, while Tanzania’s framework is less comprehensive. The paper recommends strengthening Tanzania’s National Defence Act with environmental provisions, advancing policy and scholarship on sustainable military training and raising awareness of its ecological impacts. The findings are relevant to the military, defence institutions, policymakers, scholars and students of environmental studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-3062/17043
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Assessment of Tanzania’s Legal Framework on Military Field Training and Environmental Protection in Comparison with China

Norga Alloyce Komba, Chen Haisong, Joseph Kizange
Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

An Assessment of Tanzania’s Legal Framework on Military Field Training and Environmental Protection in Comparison with China

Norga Alloyce Komba, Chen Haisong, Joseph Kizange
article en

Abstract

This paper assesses Tanzania’s environmental legislation on military field training in comparison with China. Both countries have ratified environmental treaties and conduct regular land, air and water training that impacts ecosystems, yet Tanzania’s military role in environmental decline has received little scrutiny. Using doctrinal and qualitative research, the study compares relevant regulations in both jurisdictions, drawing lessons from China’s more developed framework. China integrates environmental norms into both military and environmental law ensuring coordination and specificity, while Tanzania’s framework is less comprehensive. The paper recommends strengthening Tanzania’s National Defence Act with environmental provisions, advancing policy and scholarship on sustainable military training and raising awareness of its ecological impacts. The findings are relevant to the military, defence institutions, policymakers, scholars and students of environmental studies.

Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa
Wuhan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Assessment of Tanzania’s Legal Framework on Military Field Training and Environmental Protection in Comparison with China — Norga Alloyce Komba, Chen Haisong, et al. · Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS