Health Expectancy: Increasingly Used, but Not Well Understood

Good health is central to human happiness and well-being. It contributes substantially to economic progress, as healthy populations live longer and are more productive. The corresponding public health policies are typically assessed based on a structural indicator for “Health Expectancy” (HE) such as the EU’s “Healthy Life Years” (HLY) or the WHO’s “Health-Adjusted Life Expectancy” (HALE). Unfortunately, HE estimates are extremely sensitive to methodological choices, an issue that is widely overlooked. First, the common practice of measuring population health by the distribution of responses to specific survey questions is ambiguous and not straightforward. Consequently, levels and trends of HE vary significantly depending on the underlying data and health indicators. Moreover, HE estimates are also highly sensitive to technical features, such as the age range and partitioning selected for analysis, as well as the technique chosen to add the health dimension to the life table; an issue that has gone remarkably unrecognized. With the aim of filling this important research gap, the European Research Council (ERC) funded a Consolidator Grant project entitled “Levels and trends of health expectancy: understanding its measurement and estimation sensitivity” (LETHE). This special issue of Comparative Population Studies (CPoS) marks the completion of this project. It contains five articles, each dealing with a specific aspect of HE computation or a concrete empirical application based on HE indicators. This editorial summarizes the insights gained during the LETHE project and aims to make users of HE aware of its methodological sensitivities through illustrative empirical examples. A better understanding of these issues is essential to ensure the indicators’ appropriate usage in research as well as in advising policy makers and public health officials. * This is the Editorial on the Special Issue "Levels and Trends of Health Expectancy: Understanding its Measurement and Estimation Sensitivity".

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Population Studies
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12765/cpos-2025-14
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Public Health Policies and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health Expectancy: Increasingly Used, but Not Well Understood

Vanessa di Lego, Patrick Lazarevič, Markus Sauerberg, Magdalena M. Muszyńska et al.
1 citations
Comparative Population Studies
Public Health Policies and Education
2.82
article

Health Expectancy: Increasingly Used, but Not Well Understood

Vanessa di Lego, Patrick Lazarevič, Markus Sauerberg, Magdalena M. Muszyńska, Paola Di Giulio, Marc Luy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Good health is central to human happiness and well-being. It contributes substantially to economic progress, as healthy populations live longer and are more productive. The corresponding public health policies are typically assessed based on a structural indicator for “Health Expectancy” (HE) such as the EU’s “Healthy Life Years” (HLY) or the WHO’s “Health-Adjusted Life Expectancy” (HALE). Unfortunately, HE estimates are extremely sensitive to methodological choices, an issue that is widely overlooked. First, the common practice of measuring population health by the distribution of responses to specific survey questions is ambiguous and not straightforward. Consequently, levels and trends of HE vary significantly depending on the underlying data and health indicators. Moreover, HE estimates are also highly sensitive to technical features, such as the age range and partitioning selected for analysis, as well as the technique chosen to add the health dimension to the life table; an issue that has gone remarkably unrecognized. With the aim of filling this important research gap, the European Research Council (ERC) funded a Consolidator Grant project entitled “Levels and trends of health expectancy: understanding its measurement and estimation sensitivity” (LETHE). This special issue of Comparative Population Studies (CPoS) marks the completion of this project. It contains five articles, each dealing with a specific aspect of HE computation or a concrete empirical application based on HE indicators. This editorial summarizes the insights gained during the LETHE project and aims to make users of HE aware of its methodological sensitivities through illustrative empirical examples. A better understanding of these issues is essential to ensure the indicators’ appropriate usage in research as well as in advising policy makers and public health officials. * This is the Editorial on the Special Issue "Levels and Trends of Health Expectancy: Understanding its Measurement and Estimation Sensitivity".

Comparative Population StudiesVol. 50
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Statistics Austria (AT), Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT), Vienna Institute of Demography (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Public Health Policies and Education
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.