The hunt for the last relevant paper: blending the best of humans and AI
<b>Background:</b> The exponential growth of research literature makes it increasingly difficult to identify all relevant studies for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. While traditional search methods are labour-intensive, modern AI-aided approaches have the potential to act as a powerful 'super-assistant' during both the searching and screening phases.<b>Objective:</b> This paper evaluates how a combined, open-source approach - merging traditional and AI-aided search and screening methods - can help identify all relevant literature up to the 'last relevant paper' for a systematic review on post-traumatic stress symptom (PTSS) trajectories after traumatic events.<b>Method:</b> We applied eight search strategies, including database searches, snowballing, full-text retrieval, and semantic search via OpenAlex. All records were screened using a combination of human reviewers, active learning, and large language models (LLMs) for quality control.<b>Results:</b> On top of replicating the original 6,701 search results, we identified an additional 3,822 records using AI-aided methods. The combination of AI tools and human screening led to 126 relevant studies, with each method uncovering papers the others missed. Notably, machine-aided techniques helped find studies with missing keywords, unusual phrasing, or limited indexing. Across all AI-assisted strategies, 10 additional studies were identified, and while the overall yield was modest, these papers were unique and relevant and would likely have been missed using traditional methods.<b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings demonstrate that even when returns are low, AI-aided approaches can meaningfully enhance coverage and offer a scalable path forward when combined with screening prioritisation. A transparent, hybrid workflow where AI serves as a 'super-assistant' can meaningfully extend the reach of systematic reviews and increase the quality of the findings, but is not ready to replace humans fully.
Authors
- Marit Sijbrandij (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5430-9810)
- Mirjam van Zuiden (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1225-2702)
- Jonathan De Bruin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-0502)
- Peter Lombaers (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8780-9376)
- Rens van de Schoot (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7736-2091)
- Sonja D. Winter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2203-002X)
- Felix Weijdema (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5150-1102)
- Bruno Messina Coimbra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5092-9625)
- Jelle Jasper Teijema (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9282-4311)
- Elizabeth M. Grandfield (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3188-4086)
- Rutger Chris Neeleman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3824-8727)
- Elena Jalsovec
- Michiel Pieter Bron (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4823-6085)
- Tale Evenhuis
- Laurens de Bruin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5452-3327)
Institutions
- University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Politieacademie (NL)
- Department of Education (ES)
- University of Missouri (US)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Littelfuse (United States) (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Journal of Psychotraumatology
- Published
- 2025-10-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2546214
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.65