The hunt for the last relevant paper: blending the best of humans and AI

<b>Background:</b> The exponential growth of research literature makes it increasingly difficult to identify all relevant studies for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. While traditional search methods are labour-intensive, modern AI-aided approaches have the potential to act as a powerful 'super-assistant' during both the searching and screening phases.<b>Objective:</b> This paper evaluates how a combined, open-source approach - merging traditional and AI-aided search and screening methods - can help identify all relevant literature up to the 'last relevant paper' for a systematic review on post-traumatic stress symptom (PTSS) trajectories after traumatic events.<b>Method:</b> We applied eight search strategies, including database searches, snowballing, full-text retrieval, and semantic search via OpenAlex. All records were screened using a combination of human reviewers, active learning, and large language models (LLMs) for quality control.<b>Results:</b> On top of replicating the original 6,701 search results, we identified an additional 3,822 records using AI-aided methods. The combination of AI tools and human screening led to 126 relevant studies, with each method uncovering papers the others missed. Notably, machine-aided techniques helped find studies with missing keywords, unusual phrasing, or limited indexing. Across all AI-assisted strategies, 10 additional studies were identified, and while the overall yield was modest, these papers were unique and relevant and would likely have been missed using traditional methods.<b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings demonstrate that even when returns are low, AI-aided approaches can meaningfully enhance coverage and offer a scalable path forward when combined with screening prioritisation. A transparent, hybrid workflow where AI serves as a 'super-assistant' can meaningfully extend the reach of systematic reviews and increase the quality of the findings, but is not ready to replace humans fully.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2546214
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The hunt for the last relevant paper: blending the best of humans and AI

Marit Sijbrandij, Mirjam van Zuiden, Jonathan De Bruin, Peter Lombaers et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

The hunt for the last relevant paper: blending the best of humans and AI

Marit Sijbrandij, Mirjam van Zuiden, Jonathan De Bruin, Peter Lombaers, Rens van de Schoot, Sonja D. Winter, Felix Weijdema, Bruno Messina Coimbra, Jelle Jasper Teijema, Elizabeth M. Grandfield, Rutger Chris Neeleman, Elena Jalsovec, Michiel Pieter Bron, Tale Evenhuis, Laurens de Bruin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The exponential growth of research literature makes it increasingly difficult to identify all relevant studies for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. While traditional search methods are labour-intensive, modern AI-aided approaches have the potential to act as a powerful 'super-assistant' during both the searching and screening phases.<b>Objective:</b> This paper evaluates how a combined, open-source approach - merging traditional and AI-aided search and screening methods - can help identify all relevant literature up to the 'last relevant paper' for a systematic review on post-traumatic stress symptom (PTSS) trajectories after traumatic events.<b>Method:</b> We applied eight search strategies, including database searches, snowballing, full-text retrieval, and semantic search via OpenAlex. All records were screened using a combination of human reviewers, active learning, and large language models (LLMs) for quality control.<b>Results:</b> On top of replicating the original 6,701 search results, we identified an additional 3,822 records using AI-aided methods. The combination of AI tools and human screening led to 126 relevant studies, with each method uncovering papers the others missed. Notably, machine-aided techniques helped find studies with missing keywords, unusual phrasing, or limited indexing. Across all AI-assisted strategies, 10 additional studies were identified, and while the overall yield was modest, these papers were unique and relevant and would likely have been missed using traditional methods.<b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings demonstrate that even when returns are low, AI-aided approaches can meaningfully enhance coverage and offer a scalable path forward when combined with screening prioritisation. A transparent, hybrid workflow where AI serves as a 'super-assistant' can meaningfully extend the reach of systematic reviews and increase the quality of the findings, but is not ready to replace humans fully.

European Journal of PsychotraumatologyVol. 16(1)
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Politieacademie (NL), Department of Education (ES), University of Missouri (US), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Littelfuse (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.