Analysis of the Profitability of Heating a Retrofitted Building with an Air Heat Pump in Polish Climatic Conditions

The transformation of energy systems towards low emission is one of the key assumptions of the climate and energy policy of the European Union and many countries around the world. These changes include not only the power and transport sectors but also the heating of residential buildings, which consume significant amounts of energy and emit large amounts of greenhouse gases. This article presents a detailed comparative analysis of the costs of heating using an air-to-water heat pump and a condensing gas boiler. The study concerned a retrofitted single-family building from the 1990s, located in southern Poland. The calculations were made taking into account daily meteorological data for two full heating seasons: 2022/2023 and 2023/2024. This approach made it possible to more precisely reproduce real operating conditions. The study was conducted for various configurations of the central heating system: surface and radiator. The following parameters were also taken into account: (1) variable heat pump parameters, such as supply temperature LWT and coefficient of performance COP; (2) current tariffs for electricity and natural gas; and (3) forecasted tariffs for electricity and natural gas in the conditions of market liberalization and phasing out of protective mechanisms. A comparison of the two heating seasons revealed lower costs with a heat pump. In some cases, the cost of heat generated by a gas boiler was over 100% higher than with a heat pump. This applies to both heating seasons. Under the current tariffs, the calculated gas cost for the first season was PLN 6856 (EUR 1605) (1 EUR = 4.27 PLN) compared to heat pump heating costs ranging from PLN 3191 to PLN 4576 (EUR 747 to 1072). For future gas and electricity tariffs, the costs were PLN 8227 (EUR 1926) for gas and PLN 3841 to PLN 5304 (EUR 899 to 1242) for a heat pump. Similarly, for the second heating season, these values were PLN 6055 (EUR 1418) for gas heating and PLN 2741–3917 (EUR 642–917) for a heat pump under the current tariffs, and PLN 7267 (EUR 1702) and PLN 3307–4540 (EUR 774–1064) under future tariffs. This means percentage savings of between approximately 33% and 55%, depending on the heating type and tariff. Therefore, the obtained results indicate the higher profitability of using an air heat pump compared to a gas boiler. This advantage was maintained in all the discussed scenarios, and its scale depended on the type of installation, supply temperature, and the selected electricity tariff. The highest economic profitability was noted for low-temperature systems. These results can provide a basis for making rational investment and design decisions in the context of the energy transformation of single-family housing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18205413
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Building energy efficiency and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the Profitability of Heating a Retrofitted Building with an Air Heat Pump in Polish Climatic Conditions

Natalia Iwaszczuk, Aleksander Iwaszczuk, Jarosław Baran
1 citations
Energies
Building energy efficiency and sustainability
1.01
article

Analysis of the Profitability of Heating a Retrofitted Building with an Air Heat Pump in Polish Climatic Conditions

Natalia Iwaszczuk, Aleksander Iwaszczuk, Jarosław Baran
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The transformation of energy systems towards low emission is one of the key assumptions of the climate and energy policy of the European Union and many countries around the world. These changes include not only the power and transport sectors but also the heating of residential buildings, which consume significant amounts of energy and emit large amounts of greenhouse gases. This article presents a detailed comparative analysis of the costs of heating using an air-to-water heat pump and a condensing gas boiler. The study concerned a retrofitted single-family building from the 1990s, located in southern Poland. The calculations were made taking into account daily meteorological data for two full heating seasons: 2022/2023 and 2023/2024. This approach made it possible to more precisely reproduce real operating conditions. The study was conducted for various configurations of the central heating system: surface and radiator. The following parameters were also taken into account: (1) variable heat pump parameters, such as supply temperature LWT and coefficient of performance COP; (2) current tariffs for electricity and natural gas; and (3) forecasted tariffs for electricity and natural gas in the conditions of market liberalization and phasing out of protective mechanisms. A comparison of the two heating seasons revealed lower costs with a heat pump. In some cases, the cost of heat generated by a gas boiler was over 100% higher than with a heat pump. This applies to both heating seasons. Under the current tariffs, the calculated gas cost for the first season was PLN 6856 (EUR 1605) (1 EUR = 4.27 PLN) compared to heat pump heating costs ranging from PLN 3191 to PLN 4576 (EUR 747 to 1072). For future gas and electricity tariffs, the costs were PLN 8227 (EUR 1926) for gas and PLN 3841 to PLN 5304 (EUR 899 to 1242) for a heat pump. Similarly, for the second heating season, these values were PLN 6055 (EUR 1418) for gas heating and PLN 2741–3917 (EUR 642–917) for a heat pump under the current tariffs, and PLN 7267 (EUR 1702) and PLN 3307–4540 (EUR 774–1064) under future tariffs. This means percentage savings of between approximately 33% and 55%, depending on the heating type and tariff. Therefore, the obtained results indicate the higher profitability of using an air heat pump compared to a gas boiler. This advantage was maintained in all the discussed scenarios, and its scale depended on the type of installation, supply temperature, and the selected electricity tariff. The highest economic profitability was noted for low-temperature systems. These results can provide a basis for making rational investment and design decisions in the context of the energy transformation of single-family housing.

EnergiesVol. 18(20)
University of Agriculture in Krakow (PL), Cracow University of Technology (PL), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Building energy efficiency and sustainability
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.