The AquaVIT-4 intercomparison of atmospheric hygrometers

Abstract. The AquaVIT-4 intercomparison of atmospheric hygrometers was conducted at the AIDA (Aerosol Interaction and Dynamics in the Atmosphere) climate simulation chamber of the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Germany, in March–April 2022, within the framework of the HEMERA H2020 EU project. The objectives were to document the performance of existing hygrometers and to support the development of novel methods for water vapor (H2O) measurements in the upper atmosphere. The AquaVIT-4 intercomparison involved seven hygrometers based on either infrared laser absorption spectroscopy or frost-point hygrometry techniques: four deployed on aircraft or stratospheric balloon platforms and three reference instruments. The simulated conditions in the AIDA chamber reproduced the characteristic atmospheric conditions of the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS, altitude range ∼ 5–28 km) in the tropics and midlatitudes, spanning 20–600 hPa pressure, 190–245 K temperature, and 0.5–530 ppm H2O mixing ratio. The campaign was divided into two phases, each consisting of 4 measurement days: an “open intercomparison”, where the simulated conditions were known to the participants, and a “blind intercomparison”, where the conditions were coordinated by independent referees and unknown to the participating teams. Here we present a statistical analysis of the entire dataset, which allows us to assess the accuracy and limitations of each instrument. For the accuracy evaluation, two sets of reference measurements were defined: one for in situ instruments, located inside the AIDA vessel, and one for extractive instruments, sampling the chamber gas through a heated inlet. This distinction accounts for H2O desorption effects, which are most prominent at low pressures and low H2O concentrations. All instruments showed good agreement with the reference values in the range of H2O >2 ppm, with mean deviations within ± 7 % for H2O >10 ppm and ± 8 % between 2–10 ppm H2O. The largest differences were found for H2O <2 ppm, a rarely observed range in the atmosphere, though most of the instruments still achieved average deviations within ± 10 %. Overall, the results of AquaVIT-4 demonstrate the high accuracy and reliability of the four involved sensors for upper-atmospheric monitoring and research applications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-5321-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The AquaVIT-4 intercomparison of atmospheric hygrometers

Harald Saathoff, Nadir Amarouche, Jean-Christophe Samake, Fabien Frérot et al.
1 citations
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.11
article

The AquaVIT-4 intercomparison of atmospheric hygrometers

Harald Saathoff, Nadir Amarouche, Jean-Christophe Samake, Fabien Frérot, Simone Brunamonti, Albert Hertzog, Claire Cénac, Béla Tuzson, Georges Durry, Masatomo Fujiwara, Mélanie Ghysels, Glenn S. Diskin, P. Monnier, Karen H. Rosenlof, Lukas Emmenegger, Ottmar Möhler, Julio Lopez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. The AquaVIT-4 intercomparison of atmospheric hygrometers was conducted at the AIDA (Aerosol Interaction and Dynamics in the Atmosphere) climate simulation chamber of the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Germany, in March–April 2022, within the framework of the HEMERA H2020 EU project. The objectives were to document the performance of existing hygrometers and to support the development of novel methods for water vapor (H2O) measurements in the upper atmosphere. The AquaVIT-4 intercomparison involved seven hygrometers based on either infrared laser absorption spectroscopy or frost-point hygrometry techniques: four deployed on aircraft or stratospheric balloon platforms and three reference instruments. The simulated conditions in the AIDA chamber reproduced the characteristic atmospheric conditions of the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere (UTLS, altitude range ∼ 5–28 km) in the tropics and midlatitudes, spanning 20–600 hPa pressure, 190–245 K temperature, and 0.5–530 ppm H2O mixing ratio. The campaign was divided into two phases, each consisting of 4 measurement days: an “open intercomparison”, where the simulated conditions were known to the participants, and a “blind intercomparison”, where the conditions were coordinated by independent referees and unknown to the participating teams. Here we present a statistical analysis of the entire dataset, which allows us to assess the accuracy and limitations of each instrument. For the accuracy evaluation, two sets of reference measurements were defined: one for in situ instruments, located inside the AIDA vessel, and one for extractive instruments, sampling the chamber gas through a heated inlet. This distinction accounts for H2O desorption effects, which are most prominent at low pressures and low H2O concentrations. All instruments showed good agreement with the reference values in the range of H2O >2 ppm, with mean deviations within ± 7 % for H2O >10 ppm and ± 8 % between 2–10 ppm H2O. The largest differences were found for H2O <2 ppm, a rarely observed range in the atmosphere, though most of the instruments still achieved average deviations within ± 10 %. Overall, the results of AquaVIT-4 demonstrate the high accuracy and reliability of the four involved sensors for upper-atmospheric monitoring and research applications.

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 18(20)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.