Time-Dependent Adhesion and Fluoride Release of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements on Demineralized Enamel, Sound Enamel and Dentine

<b>Background:</b> The treatment of cavitated lesions has evolved with minimally invasive dentistry (MID), whereby we can leave demineralized enamel that could potentially be remineralizable with the use of materials such as resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) that allow these lesions to be repaired and remineralized while removing less tooth tissue. The aim of our study was to compare the influence of aging on adhesion to sound enamel, demineralized enamel, and the healthy dentin of five RMGICs (Vitremer<sup>®</sup>, ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative, Riva LC, Ionolux<sup>®</sup>, and GC Fuji II LC) and fluoride release. There are currently no studies on adhesion in demineralized enamel. <b>Method</b>: A total of 1035 bovine incisors were analyzed in 45 groups of 23 teeth each. The groups were established based on three factors: time (24 h, 1 month, and 3 months); substrate (sound enamel, demineralized enamel, and healthy dentin); and type of material. In each group, 20 samples underwent shear bond strength (SBS) and fracture type analysis. Adhesive interfaces were observed in three samples from each group using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). Daily and cumulative fluoride release rates were calculated. <b>Results</b>: Adhesion improved over time on both demineralized and sound enamel. ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative had the highest SBS values (33.63 ± 10.69 MPa), and Vitremer<sup>®</sup> had the lowest (4.10 ± 4.63). Most fractures were adhesive. Vitremer<sup>®</sup> and Ionolux<sup>®</sup> showed the highest daily and cumulative fluoride release rates (Vitremer daily (24 h): 225.30 ± 26.28 ppm/g; Vitremer cumulative (30 days): 635.99 ± 305.38 ppm/g; Ionolux daily (24 h): 207.59 ± 48.43 ppm/g; Ionolux cumulative (30 days): 501.21 ± 138.71 ppm/g) and ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative showed the lowest (ACTIVA daily (24 h): 10.50 ± 0.85; ACTIVA cumulative (30 days): 39.10 ± 2.16). <b>Conclusions</b>: ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative was the material with the best adhesion values on all substrates and at all times, but it showed the lowest fluoride release rates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207166
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time-Dependent Adhesion and Fluoride Release of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements on Demineralized Enamel, Sound Enamel and Dentine

Amparo Pérez‐Silva, Yolanda Martínez Beneyto, Inmaculada Cabello, Antonio José Ortiz Ruiz et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
article

Time-Dependent Adhesion and Fluoride Release of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements on Demineralized Enamel, Sound Enamel and Dentine

Amparo Pérez‐Silva, Yolanda Martínez Beneyto, Inmaculada Cabello, Antonio José Ortiz Ruiz, Inmaculada Gómez-Ríos, Pilar Valverde-Rubio, Pilar Cereceda-Villaescusa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The treatment of cavitated lesions has evolved with minimally invasive dentistry (MID), whereby we can leave demineralized enamel that could potentially be remineralizable with the use of materials such as resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) that allow these lesions to be repaired and remineralized while removing less tooth tissue. The aim of our study was to compare the influence of aging on adhesion to sound enamel, demineralized enamel, and the healthy dentin of five RMGICs (Vitremer<sup>®</sup>, ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative, Riva LC, Ionolux<sup>®</sup>, and GC Fuji II LC) and fluoride release. There are currently no studies on adhesion in demineralized enamel. <b>Method</b>: A total of 1035 bovine incisors were analyzed in 45 groups of 23 teeth each. The groups were established based on three factors: time (24 h, 1 month, and 3 months); substrate (sound enamel, demineralized enamel, and healthy dentin); and type of material. In each group, 20 samples underwent shear bond strength (SBS) and fracture type analysis. Adhesive interfaces were observed in three samples from each group using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). Daily and cumulative fluoride release rates were calculated. <b>Results</b>: Adhesion improved over time on both demineralized and sound enamel. ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative had the highest SBS values (33.63 ± 10.69 MPa), and Vitremer<sup>®</sup> had the lowest (4.10 ± 4.63). Most fractures were adhesive. Vitremer<sup>®</sup> and Ionolux<sup>®</sup> showed the highest daily and cumulative fluoride release rates (Vitremer daily (24 h): 225.30 ± 26.28 ppm/g; Vitremer cumulative (30 days): 635.99 ± 305.38 ppm/g; Ionolux daily (24 h): 207.59 ± 48.43 ppm/g; Ionolux cumulative (30 days): 501.21 ± 138.71 ppm/g) and ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative showed the lowest (ACTIVA daily (24 h): 10.50 ± 0.85; ACTIVA cumulative (30 days): 39.10 ± 2.16). <b>Conclusions</b>: ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative was the material with the best adhesion values on all substrates and at all times, but it showed the lowest fluoride release rates.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(20)
Universidad de Granada (ES), Universidad Católica de Murcia (ES), Universidad de Murcia (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.