FORMATION OF CULTURAL CENTERS IN THE POST-WAR RECONSTRUCTION OF UKRAINE

The article explores the significance of cultural centers in Ukraine’s post-war recovery, emphasizing their role not only as architectural elements but as crucial instruments for rebuilding social cohesion, identity, and resilience. In the context of post-conflict reconstruction, culture serves as a bridge between memory and innovation, between trauma and transformation. The research identifies the central principles of integrating cultural infrastructure into the urban fabric of destroyed or heavily affected cities. Drawing on Ukrainian case studies (Chernivtsi, Lutsk, Ivano-Frankivsk, Sumy, Drohobych) and European models of post-war urban renewal (such as the Ruhr region in Germany or Balkan reconstruction efforts), the article emphasizes a multifunctional, participatory, and context-sensitive approach. Cultural centers are presented as dynamic hubs that combine artistic, educational, and civic functions while fostering local identity and promoting inclusive urban spaces. The study aims to define practical recommendations for integrating cultural centers into the strategies of urban redevelopment in Ukraine. The research objectives include identifying the core functions of cultural centers, synthesizing international and domestic best practices, and proposing participatory urban planning principles tailored to Ukrainian realities. The methodological framework encompasses historical and comparative analysis, case study examination, and expert evaluation. The findings highlight the need for adaptive reuse of ruins and preserved structures, flexible spatial zoning, strong community engagement, and transparent institutional support. These components are essential for establishing cultural spaces that are not only architecturally sustainable but socially embedded and resilient. The article concludes that cultural centers are more than buildings — they are vital to the healing and future- making processes of Ukrainian cities. Their formation should be based on the principles of barrier-free, cultural identity, multifunctionality, sustainability, renewal and territorial equality and integration. Effective implementation of such projects is possible under the conditions of active participation of communities, professional consulting of architects and support from the state and international donors. Further research should focus on typological models for cultural integration in small towns, mechanisms of public participation, and long-term monitoring of cultural infrastructure effectiveness.