Estimating asian elephant abundance: a comparative analysis of dung counts and genetic SECR in a known population of Kodagu, Karnataka, India

These results demonstrate that genetic SECR not only reduces estimation bias but also reveals evolutionary relevant insights into genetic diversity and population structure. While genetic methods require greater per-unit investment compared to dung counts, a hybrid strategy may be most practical: periodic genetic SECR surveys to calibrate and validate easier methods (like dung counts or camera traps) used more frequently. As technology advances, costs of fecal DNA analysis are likely to decrease further. This hybrid framework optimizes resource allocation while maintaining scientific rigor, particularly important for large-scale monitoring programs across diverse landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-025-02439-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating asian elephant abundance: a comparative analysis of dung counts and genetic SECR in a known population of Kodagu, Karnataka, India

Sanath Krishna Muliya, Vishnupriya Kolipakam, Souritra Sharma, Lallianpuii Kawlni et al.
1 citations
BMC Ecology and Evolution
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
article

Estimating asian elephant abundance: a comparative analysis of dung counts and genetic SECR in a known population of Kodagu, Karnataka, India

Sanath Krishna Muliya, Vishnupriya Kolipakam, Souritra Sharma, Lallianpuii Kawlni, Qamar Qureshi, Bhawana Pant, Ujjwal Kumar, Harish Matta, Samrat Mondol, Ramesh Kumar Pandey, Mayur V. Markad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

These results demonstrate that genetic SECR not only reduces estimation bias but also reveals evolutionary relevant insights into genetic diversity and population structure. While genetic methods require greater per-unit investment compared to dung counts, a hybrid strategy may be most practical: periodic genetic SECR surveys to calibrate and validate easier methods (like dung counts or camera traps) used more frequently. As technology advances, costs of fecal DNA analysis are likely to decrease further. This hybrid framework optimizes resource allocation while maintaining scientific rigor, particularly important for large-scale monitoring programs across diverse landscapes.

BMC Ecology and EvolutionVol. 25(1)
Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (IN), Wildlife Institute of India (IN), Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (IN)
Ministry of Environment
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Estimating asian elephant abundance: a comparative analysis of dung counts and genetic SECR in a known population of Kodagu, Karnataka, India — Sanath Krishna Muliya, Vishnupriya Kolipakam, et al. · BMC Ecology and Evolution (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS