Diagnostic accuracy of otitis media with and without a fictitious AI support among physicians in primary care and medical students
We report modest diagnostic accuracy for OM among primary care physicians and medical students. The fictitious AI support system improved both accuracy and diagnostic confidence and reduced over-diagnosis. The most experienced physicians achieved the highest accuracy, the less experienced were more often misled by the fictitious AI.
Authors
- Thorbjörn Lundberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1478-4945)
- Malin Hedman
- Mimmi Werner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9031-565X)
- Josefin Sandström (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9425-8632)
- Mikael Lindmark (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1536-4600)
- Karin Rystedt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9891-3315)
- Fredrik Öhberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3363-7414)
- Pär‐Daniel Sundvall (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9889-509X)
- B. Trinh
- Vezira Kosuta
Institutions
- Primary Health Care (QA)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Umeå University (SE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
- Published
- 2025-10-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2025.2571936
- Primary Topic
- Radiology practices and education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00