Performance of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes against Pod Borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hübner)

The present study evaluated the resistance of sixteen field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes, including the reference genotype FPD 21-148, against Helicoverpa armigera, a destructive pod borer pest causing significant yield losses, in Sehore district, Malwa region, Madhya Pradesh, during the Rabi season 2021-22. Screening was conducted under field conditions, and pest incidence was monitored from pod initiation to till harvesting by recorded the weekly mean larval population from ten randomly selected plants per genotype. At harvest, pod damage percentage and grain yield were assessed on three plants per genotype. Results revealed that FPD 21-150, FPD 21-151, FPD 21-155, and FPD 21-159 were moderately susceptible, whereas FPD 21-148, FPD 21-149, and FPD 21-158 exhibited the least susceptibility to infestation of pod borer, H. armigera. The remaining genotypes were highly susceptible. The larval population was lowest in FPD 21-148 (2.22 larvae/plant) and highest in FPD 21-154 (4.78 larvae/plant). Grain yield ranged from 2815 kg/ha (FPD 21-148) to 1045 kg/ha (FPD 21-154), while pod damage varied from 23.09% to 41.81%, respectively. A strong negative association was observed between infestation level and yield. The findings emphasize the potential of incorporating host plant resistance into integrated pest management for sustainable field pea cultivation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2025/v31i103607
Primary Topic
Agricultural pest management studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes against Pod Borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hübner)

Shraddha Tare, Nanda Khandwe, Manish Gadekar, Subhashree Patnaik
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports
Agricultural pest management studies
article

Performance of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes against Pod Borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hübner)

Shraddha Tare, Nanda Khandwe, Manish Gadekar, Subhashree Patnaik
article en

Abstract

The present study evaluated the resistance of sixteen field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes, including the reference genotype FPD 21-148, against Helicoverpa armigera, a destructive pod borer pest causing significant yield losses, in Sehore district, Malwa region, Madhya Pradesh, during the Rabi season 2021-22. Screening was conducted under field conditions, and pest incidence was monitored from pod initiation to till harvesting by recorded the weekly mean larval population from ten randomly selected plants per genotype. At harvest, pod damage percentage and grain yield were assessed on three plants per genotype. Results revealed that FPD 21-150, FPD 21-151, FPD 21-155, and FPD 21-159 were moderately susceptible, whereas FPD 21-148, FPD 21-149, and FPD 21-158 exhibited the least susceptibility to infestation of pod borer, H. armigera. The remaining genotypes were highly susceptible. The larval population was lowest in FPD 21-148 (2.22 larvae/plant) and highest in FPD 21-154 (4.78 larvae/plant). Grain yield ranged from 2815 kg/ha (FPD 21-148) to 1045 kg/ha (FPD 21-154), while pod damage varied from 23.09% to 41.81%, respectively. A strong negative association was observed between infestation level and yield. The findings emphasize the potential of incorporating host plant resistance into integrated pest management for sustainable field pea cultivation.

Journal of Scientific Research and ReportsVol. 31(10)
Lakshmibai National Institute of Physical Education (IN), Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Agricultural pest management studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.