Towards an Explainable Linguistic Approach to the Identification of Expressive Forms Within Arabic Text
This paper presents a rule-based negation and litotes detection system for Modern Standard Arabic. Unlike purely statistical approaches, the proposed pipeline leverages linguistic structures, lexical resources, and dependency parsing to identify negated expressions, exception clauses, and instances of litotic inversion, where rhetorical negation conveys an implicit positive meaning. The system was applied to a large-scale subset of the Arabic OSCAR corpus, filtered by sentence length and syntactic structure. The results show the successful detection of 5193 negated expressions and 1953 litotic expressions through antonym matching. Additionally, 200 instances involving exception prepositions were identified, reflecting their syntactic specificity and rarity in Arabic. The system is fully interpretable, reproducible, and well-suited to low-resource environments where machine learning approaches may not be viable. Its ability to scale across heterogeneous data while preserving linguistic sensitivity demonstrates the relevance of rule-based systems for morphologically rich and structurally complex languages. This work contributes a practical framework for analyzing negation phenomena and offers insight into rhetorical inversion in Arabic discourse. Although coverage of rarer structures is limited, the pipeline provides a solid foundation for future refinement and domain-specific applications in figurative language processing.
Authors
- Laila El Jiani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1797-7446)
- Zouheir Banou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6427-2342)
- El Habib Benlahmar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7098-4621)
- Sanaa El Filali (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8933-1564)
- F.Z. Alaoui
Institutions
- University of Hassan II Casablanca (MA)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-10-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025112026
- Primary Topic
- Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00