Visual Scanning and Technique Improve Performance in a Standardized Soccer Passing Task

Background/Objectives: Passing is the most frequent and impactful action in soccer. It requires players to control the ball and pass accurately with either foot, make quick decisions, and scan the field while under pressure. Using a recently developed series of passing tests that vary in complexity and scanning demands, we examined how a player’s choice of technique when controlling and passing the ball, along with their ability to scan effectively, influenced passing performance. Methods: Forty-five elite U12 and U13 players from a Brazilian academy completed three passing tests involving directional turns across 120°, 180°, and 360°. Each pass was video-coded based on foot orientation (back or front foot), foot dominance (dominant or nondominant), and pass direction (toward the dominant or nondominant side). The study tested whether (i) the most common technique used varied with pass direction due to a preference for the dominant foot, (ii) performance varied across foot techniques, and (iii) scanning prior to ball reception enhanced outcomes. Results: Players preferred techniques that used their dominant foot, such as controlling and passing with their back foot (back–back) when turning to the dominant side (58% in 120° and 57% in 180° tests) and controlling with their back foot and passing with the front (back–front) for the nondominant side (66% and 55%; χ2 = 292.96 and 312.87, p < 0.001). However, using the dominant foot sometimes led to slower, less efficient actions. In the 120° test, back–front was the fastest technique (+1.11 passes/min vs. back–back), while front–back was the slowest (−4.20 passes/min, p < 0.001). In the 360° test, scanning improved turn accuracy (from 51% to 73%) and performance, resulting in 4.20 more passes/min, fewer control errors (11% vs. 31%), and fewer target misses (3% vs. 10%; all p < 0.001). Conclusions: These findings highlight the value of effective scanning and foot technique under varied conditions, and offers coaches a practical tool for player analysis, feedback, and development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152011045
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual Scanning and Technique Improve Performance in a Standardized Soccer Passing Task

Andrew H. Hunter, Paulo Roberto Pereira Santiago, Robbie Stuart Wilson, Nicholas M. A. Smith
Applied Sciences
Sports Performance and Training
article

Visual Scanning and Technique Improve Performance in a Standardized Soccer Passing Task

Andrew H. Hunter, Paulo Roberto Pereira Santiago, Robbie Stuart Wilson, Nicholas M. A. Smith
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Passing is the most frequent and impactful action in soccer. It requires players to control the ball and pass accurately with either foot, make quick decisions, and scan the field while under pressure. Using a recently developed series of passing tests that vary in complexity and scanning demands, we examined how a player’s choice of technique when controlling and passing the ball, along with their ability to scan effectively, influenced passing performance. Methods: Forty-five elite U12 and U13 players from a Brazilian academy completed three passing tests involving directional turns across 120°, 180°, and 360°. Each pass was video-coded based on foot orientation (back or front foot), foot dominance (dominant or nondominant), and pass direction (toward the dominant or nondominant side). The study tested whether (i) the most common technique used varied with pass direction due to a preference for the dominant foot, (ii) performance varied across foot techniques, and (iii) scanning prior to ball reception enhanced outcomes. Results: Players preferred techniques that used their dominant foot, such as controlling and passing with their back foot (back–back) when turning to the dominant side (58% in 120° and 57% in 180° tests) and controlling with their back foot and passing with the front (back–front) for the nondominant side (66% and 55%; χ2 = 292.96 and 312.87, p < 0.001). However, using the dominant foot sometimes led to slower, less efficient actions. In the 120° test, back–front was the fastest technique (+1.11 passes/min vs. back–back), while front–back was the slowest (−4.20 passes/min, p < 0.001). In the 360° test, scanning improved turn accuracy (from 51% to 73%) and performance, resulting in 4.20 more passes/min, fewer control errors (11% vs. 31%), and fewer target misses (3% vs. 10%; all p < 0.001). Conclusions: These findings highlight the value of effective scanning and foot technique under varied conditions, and offers coaches a practical tool for player analysis, feedback, and development.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(20)
The University of Queensland (AU), Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.