Can Nutritional Screening Tools Predict the Prognosis of Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis?

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Although nutritional status is critical to the clinical outcomes of septic patients, studies on this topic are limited. We aim to assess the prognostic value of five nutritional screening tools (NSTs) for septic patients both at the time of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and five days later. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This prospective observational study included adult septic patients in the ICU. Patients were divided into two groups: survivors and non-survivors. Clinical, laboratory characteristics, and NST values [The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT), Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), and Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill (NUTRIC)] were recorded at admission and on Day-5, and intergroup and intragroup comparisons were performed. <i>Results</i>: A total of 126 patients were included in this study: 97 in the survival group and 29 in the non-survival group. The non-survivors had higher CONUT and NUTRIC scores and lower PNI scores. Multivariate analysis found higher Day-5 NUTRIC scores independently associated with mortality. ROC analysis identified NUTRIC > 6 as a mortality predictor. <i>Conclusions</i>: Although several markers differed significantly between survivors and non-survivors, our findings show that a high Day-5 NUTRIC score was the only factor independently associated with mortality among NSTs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101846
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Nutritional Screening Tools Predict the Prognosis of Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis?

Duygu Kayar Çalılı, Şeval İzdeş, Demet Bolukbasi
Medicina
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Can Nutritional Screening Tools Predict the Prognosis of Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis?

Duygu Kayar Çalılı, Şeval İzdeş, Demet Bolukbasi
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Although nutritional status is critical to the clinical outcomes of septic patients, studies on this topic are limited. We aim to assess the prognostic value of five nutritional screening tools (NSTs) for septic patients both at the time of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and five days later. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This prospective observational study included adult septic patients in the ICU. Patients were divided into two groups: survivors and non-survivors. Clinical, laboratory characteristics, and NST values [The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT), Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), and Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill (NUTRIC)] were recorded at admission and on Day-5, and intergroup and intragroup comparisons were performed. <i>Results</i>: A total of 126 patients were included in this study: 97 in the survival group and 29 in the non-survival group. The non-survivors had higher CONUT and NUTRIC scores and lower PNI scores. Multivariate analysis found higher Day-5 NUTRIC scores independently associated with mortality. ROC analysis identified NUTRIC > 6 as a mortality predictor. <i>Conclusions</i>: Although several markers differed significantly between survivors and non-survivors, our findings show that a high Day-5 NUTRIC score was the only factor independently associated with mortality among NSTs.

MedicinaVol. 61(10)
Bilkent University (TR), Memorial Ankara Hospital (TR), Başkent University Hospital (TR), Türk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Derneği (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.